Sciencetext Tips & Tricks

Tech talk, social media, blogging, computing tips and tricks

Why Twitter Followers Qwit

January 30th, 2009 · by David Bradley >> 9 Comments

  • Share/Bookmark

qwitterJust today, the Qwitter service told me that 11 of my twitter followers had stopped following my tweets overnight. I must admit seeing such a cluster of qwitters was quite a shock. Luckily, thirteen more tweeps had started following me over the same period.

Qwitter lets you know at what point people some following, i.e. after which tweet you lost them. It doesn’t necessarily mean it was the specific tweet, there are a whole host of other reasons. In fact, if Qwitter simply pings and compares your followers list on a specific time cycle then if it catches a bunch of qwitters who have left it will tag the same tweet for all of them, which is annoying and betrays just how useless it is to worry about indivdual tweets.

Just out of interesting, according to Qwitter those 11 abandoned me after I replied to @tim_yates.

I’d tweeted a link highlighting how in the UK it is illegal to scrape or otherwise sample a person’s DNA without permission. Tim pointed out how crazy it is for such a crime as DNA theft to exist given that the authorities can store your genetic material in perpetuity.

My response was that: “Yes, we’re a nation of legal contradictions, the law is indeed an ass.”

The “law is an ass”, it’s a common enough English idiom and refers to both the stubbornness and stupidity of the donkey-like animal as opposed to what an American might understand the word ass to mean. In British English that would be arse.

So, was my having tweeted that the law is an ass, the real reason those 11 (pity it hadn’t been 12 for a full jury) qwitted my tweets? It’s hard to tell. @altepper was the first to abandon me. I must admit, I’d not engaged much with this guy, he was a follower of a friend who is still following me as far as I recall, so nice knowing you altepper but bye bye.

The next qwitter was @Realtrix. This guy listed no bio on twitter and has a very blurry photograph. But, more to the point he seems to have a disproportionately small number of followers but a large number of people whom he follows. I should’ve spotted that issue when I first followed him. It’s often a sign that a tweep isn’t likely to be engaged much with their followers. Moreover, if his ratio had been just a little bit higher, I’d have assumed he was a spammer, or at best an affiliate marketer. So, au revoir Realtrix.

@mikegermano was next to qwit on exactly the same “law is an ass” tweet. Mike looks like a go-getter ex-politician now running a new media agency. I suspect he and I simply didn’t overlap on tweet content for some reason, although he may have been offended my legal idiom. Who knows? Auf wiedersehn Mike.

Then there was Natalie Brown, a Canadian singer songwriter who does “sweet soul and RnB meets catchy pop”> not my cup of tea, I’m afraid, and I never followed her so I don’t blame her for unfollowing me. Ciao, bella!

The self-styled “King of new media”, madmain was next to qwit my tweets. He’s a “advertiser, badvertiser, cadvertiser, dadvertiser and fadvertiser” apparently, and into karaoke and has several thousands of followers, I was never one of them, so I suspect his auto-unfollow ditched me.

@Surion barely touched the sides, with only a handful of friends and followers and posts often in a tongue foreign to me, I never did follow him, poor guy, now he’s one followee down. Sayonara Surion.

@launchlab is a business newsletter, covering areas on which I rarely write so I never did subscribe to their point of view and they’ve duly unfollowed me (presumably using an unfollow script).

I don’t remember seeing Carmen Holotescu follow me, so I never did check out her bio and tweets with the intention of following her back. Shame. Her stuff looks interesting. The same goes for d_rey who seems to have a claim on working for technorati.com…hmmm… La revedere guys.

Linc4Justice is heavy on the following, low on the followers and seems to reply to tweets almost exclusively rather than tweeting new ideas, thoughts, or links. I guess we were never going to make it. Seeya.

Finally, BookPage adds a footnote.

To all my twitter followers who became my twitter unfollowers:

So long, farewell, auf wiedersehn, a dieu, to yieu and yieu and yieu and yieu and yieu. Y’all come back now.

Oh by the way, OutsideMyBrain had the brilliant idea of writing an Ode to the Followers, the fabulous fifteen tweeps who followed me while the infamous eleven were abandoning me…watch out for that on Sciencetext soon!

9 responses so far ↓

  • David Bradley // Jan 30, 2009 at 9:35 am

    Incidentally, none of these were suspended accounts. If you see a lot of qwitters with suspended accounts, it usually means they were either spammers or too-long inactive accounts. Twitter clears out those accounts periodically. If you have not blocked spammy followers then you will see occasional drops in your twittercount.

  • Jon Buscall // Jan 30, 2009 at 10:57 am

    Brilliant ! If only some of the Social Media gurus had a sense of humour.

    Cause enough to follow you.

  • Conrad Halling // Jan 30, 2009 at 12:12 pm

    Many of your science-related posts are interesting, and ScienceBase might turn out to be a useful service. So it is with some feelings of regret that I have stopped following you, but you tweet too often. Also, I’m not interested in how many followers you have. This is just one busy person’s opinion.

  • David Bradley // Jan 30, 2009 at 2:36 pm

    Sad to see you go Conrad, I’m certainly not the most prolific of tweeps. As to letting people know how many followers I have, this post was not meant to do that alone but was meant to provide people who use twitter with some insight as to what might be happening if they suddenly lose lots of followers in one go. It was surprising and odd that Qwitter told me they all unfollowed because of one tweet. I think that says more about how Qwitter works than the twitterhood.

    I run Sciencetext as a tech commentary and help blog whereas Sciencebase is the science news and views wing. Please do check out the feed on that site http://www.sciencebase.com/feed Usually 3-4 posts a week and none of the twittering ;-)

  • Natalie Brown // Apr 24, 2009 at 12:23 pm

    Just so you know, I unfollowed u cuz we weren’t engaging each other (cuz I’m not ur cup of tea!) and that is what Social media is all about. I have no problems with the word ass, none whatsoever!

    Peace,
    Bella Natalie Brown

  • David Bradley // Apr 24, 2009 at 1:36 pm

    Hey Natalie. Nice to hear from you! We’re engaging now, right? Maybe I should give your stuff another listen…even though it wasn’t my cup of tea then, perhaps it could be my G&T on the rocks with a slice instead, eh? Cheers!

  • Natalie Brown // Apr 25, 2009 at 3:57 am

    Hi David!

    Yes, we are enganing… isn’t it fun! I actually was intrigues by your Qwitter experiment. I notice they are no longer Qwitting, but Muggin’! LOL

    I appreciate you having a re-listen and being open minded. I also really appreciated your Tweet.

    So does the music qualify as your G&T on the rocks with a slice? Would that be an orange, lemon or lime slice? I wonder!

    Have a tweriffic weekend!

    C-ya,
    Nat

  • David Bradley // Apr 25, 2009 at 8:19 am

    Oh, it’s gotta be lemon and I think your music would make a perfect accompaniment to that on a balmy English summer’s evening (rare). Like I said in my tweet Beautiful Day, Beautiful Music – Check it out Sciencetexters – http://www.natalie-brown.com/music.html

  • Sinisa Desic // May 17, 2009 at 1:01 pm

    It is all true :)