Sciencetext提示和技巧

Tech talk, social media, computing tips and tricks 技術講座，社會媒體，計算技巧和竅門

Twitter Decision Flowchart Twitter的決策流程圖

May 7th, 2009 · by David Bradley >> 2009年5月7日·由大衛布拉德利“” 30 Comments 30評論

twitter-decision-flowchart1 Twitter is the place to be online and tips abound. Twitter的是地方可在線進行並提示比比皆是。 But, how do you decide whether to follow someone who has followed you?但是，你如何決定是否跟進的人誰也跟著你？ There are some basic filters you can use, like not following back obvious spammers and scammers and generally not following people with protected tweets unless you know them already.有一些基本的過濾器可以使用，如不按回明顯的垃圾郵件製造者和騙子，一般不按人與保護鳴叫，除非你知道他們了。

Anyway, I've created a flowchart to help you decide whether to follow someone who followed you on Twitter (click the image to get a fullsize view).無論如何，我創建了一個流程圖來幫助你決定是否跟進的人誰跟著你的Twitter（單擊該圖像獲得全螢幕視圖）。 Incidentally, I am not quite so strict as this flowchart implies so please do follow me as順便說一句，我沒有那麼嚴格，因為這意味著流程圖所以請不要跟著我的 @sciencebase @ sciencebase : ：

twitter-decision-flowchart1

I asked我問 (Anti)Social Development blogger （反）社會發展的Blogger Kim Woodbridge金伍德布里奇 for her editorial thoughts on the Twitter flowchart before publishing, and so the decision diamond for avatar/photo assessment is more lenient than it was.她編輯的思考Twitter的流程圖前出版，所以決定鑽石的頭像/照片評估寬於它。 It was Kim that mentioned locked tweeps too, although I didn't embed that thought process into the flow diagram.這是金的鎖定tweeps也提到，雖然我沒有嵌入到這種思想的過程流程圖。

30 responses so far ↓ 30答复迄今↓

  • Kim Woodbridge 金伍德布里奇 // May 7, 2009 at 4:53 pm / / 2009年5月7日的下午4點53分

    Hi David – Thanks for letting me know you had posted it.您好大衛-感謝您讓我知道你把它貼。 When I commented on a couple of articles yesterday I was actually looking to see if this was available yet.當我談到一對夫婦的文章，昨天我其實，看看這是否是尚未推向市場。

    I hope others stop by and let you know if their thought process is similar to this one.我希望其他人制止，並讓你知道，如果他們的思維過程是類似的。

  • David Bradley 大衛布拉德利 // May 7, 2009 at 5:23 pm / / 2009年5月7日在下午5時23分

    Yeah, already had some good tweets about it…是啊，已經有一些很好的鳴叫對此...

  • Rudy 魯迪 // May 7, 2009 at 5:26 pm / / 2009年5月7日在下午5時26分

    You don't follow anyone who follows over 50 people?你的人誰不遵循以下50人以上？ Seems a little harsh to me.似乎有點苛刻，我。 :-)

  • David Bradley 大衛布拉德利 // May 7, 2009 at 5:35 pm / / 2009年5月7日在下午5時35分

    Hah…no, only if they're following >> 50 and have Followers = 0 Should I have used a combined box do you think?哈...沒有，只有當他們下面的“”50，並追隨者= 0我是否應該用結合框你覺得呢？ Those tweeps are usually spammers…這些tweeps通常是垃圾郵件發送者...

  • Rudy 魯迪 // May 7, 2009 at 5:39 pm / / 2009年5月7日在下午5時39

    Ah, that's right, I missed the Followers = 0 box.啊，沒錯，我錯過了追隨者= 0框。 However, chances are spammers will hit a few people who runs auto-follow, so they'll have at least 1 follower.但是，機會是垃圾郵件發送者將達到少數人誰運行自動跟隨，因此他們將至少有1追隨者。

  • David Bradley 大衛布拉德利 // May 7, 2009 at 5:41 pm / / 2009年5月7日在下午5時41分

    Ooh, that's a point.噢，這是一個問題。 It's a general rule of thumb though.這是一個一般規則，但經驗。 If someone is following 1846 followers but has just half a dozen people following them back, they're probably not likely to be the most engaging of tweeps.如果有人是1846年之後的追隨者，但只有半十幾人回來後，他們很可能不會成為最迷人的tweeps。

  • Tracy 特雷西 // May 7, 2009 at 6:56 pm / / 2009年5月7日在下午6時56分

    It cracks me up to think that there are probably significant numbers of spammers whose following list consists only of other spammers having these Tweetlater-enabled monologues at each other.這裂縫我到認為有可能是大量的垃圾郵件，其下面的列表只包含其他垃圾郵件發送者擁有這些Tweetlater功能的獨白對方。

    I bet somebody who is smart and science fiction-y could right a fine novel about that.我敢打賭，誰是聰明人的科幻小說，輜可右的罰款小說一下。

  • David Bradley 大衛布拉德利 // May 7, 2009 at 7:23 pm / / 2009年5月7日在下午7時23分

    I think you're right Tracy, in fact didn't somebody do a spoof on April 1 about email systems sending autoreplies to messages and automated responses being sent back and so on ad infinitum?我認為你是對的麥蒂，其實並沒有人做欺騙性4月1日對電子郵件系統發送的郵件自動回覆和自動響應被送回，並如此循環往復？

  • Kim Woodbridge 金伍德布里奇 // May 7, 2009 at 7:29 pm / / 2009年5月7日在7:29 pm

    @Tracy – Ok – that is the funniest thing I've read all day @特雷西-玉-這是最有趣的一件事我讀過一天 :-) It sort of sounds like a possible Cory Doctorow novel.這聽起來有點像一個可能科利多克托羅的小說。

  • Mike Nichols 邁克尼科爾斯 // May 8, 2009 at 3:49 am / / 2009年5月8日在上午03時49分

    Your reasoning in the flow chart matches mine to the “T.”你的理由，在我的流程圖匹配的“噸”

    I've tweeted with lots of people who think that if you don't follow everybody, you're a snob.啾啾我與很多人認為，誰如果不遵循每一個人，你是一個勢利。

    Not so.並非如此。 I've got only limited time, and I think that choosing to follow those I think will make best use of that time is the smart way to go.只是我有時間限制，我認為這些選擇遵循我認為會的最佳利用，時間是最聰明的辦法去。

    Thanks for a great decision tree!感謝偉大的決策樹！

  • Yuri Alkin 尤里正煒 // May 8, 2009 at 5:25 am / / 2009年5月8日在上午05點25

    Great and useful chart.大和有用的圖表。 It'd be good to showcase it Twitter site — almost all new Twitter users would benefit from it.它很適合展示給大家看Twitter網站-幾乎所有的新Twitter的用戶將受益於它。 Better yet, some parts of this logic can be implemented as part of “follow” button code, so that people trying to follow a spam account would get warning (obviously that'd be an opt-in feature).更好的是，某些地區這種邏輯可以實現的一部分“追踪”按鈕的代碼，使人們試圖沿著一條垃圾郵件的帳戶會得到警告（顯然是想將選入功能）。 The logic of this chart would fail to catch a more sophisticated spam accounts (“twitterators” and “twones” whose evolution I've been following on my blog這個邏輯圖將無法趕上更先進的垃圾郵件帳戶（“twitterators”和“twones”，其演變之後我一直在我的博客 http://bit.ly/6akmW) http://bit.ly/6akmW） , but it can be certainly extended. ，但是可以肯定延長。

  • David Bradley 大衛布拉德利 // May 8, 2009 at 8:16 am / / 2009年5月8日在上午08點16

    @Yuri I don't think we'd need to use the Twitter API to run this flowchart, I'm sure some clever programmer could create a Greasemonkey script that would do the job of filtering and perhaps have variable parameters. @尤里我不認為我們就需要使用Twitter的API來運行此流程圖，我肯定有一些聰明的程序員可以創建一個Greasemonkey腳本，將完成這項工作的過濾，這也許是可變參數。

    @Mike Yeah, who's got time to follow everybody? @邁克是啊，誰的時間按照每個人？ Moreover, when you're providing regular news a lot of followers are following simply to keep up to date with what you're offering, they don't necessarily want to engage and stop by for a chat anyway.此外，當您提供定期的新聞不少的追隨者以下只是為了不斷更新與您提供的服務，他們並不一定想參與並停止了聊天反正。

  • Dr Shock MD PhD 醫學博士博士休克 // May 8, 2009 at 8:20 pm / / 2009年5月8日在下午八時20分

    Nice, completely agree.尼斯，完全同意。 Also value a link to a blog or website for some information, some bio's are just not ensuring enough.也值一個鏈接到博客或網站的一些信息，一些生物的，只是沒有足夠的保障。 So after bio> landing page >yes>follow所以在生物“目標網頁”是“跟進
    Kind regards Dr Shock親切的問候休克博士

  • David Bradley 大衛布拉德利 // May 9, 2009 at 8:44 am / / 2009年5月9日在上午08時44分

    Yes, I usually check out a person's link too.是的，我通常簽出一個人的聯繫了。 If it turns out to be a long-form marketing web page selling some scammy nonsense, they get blocked.如果證明是一項長期的營銷網頁的形式出售部分scammy胡說八道，他們被封鎖。

  • Karen James 卡倫詹姆斯 // May 10, 2009 at 12:53 am / / 09年5月10日在上午12點53分

    Ditto on checking the link, plus several other tweaks:同上檢查環節上，加上一些其它的改進：

    Number of updates (if 1, then I scrutinise for spam-like qualities, eg free laptop) and the date of last update (if >2 months=defunct).數更新（如果為1，那麼我為審議垃圾般的素質，如免費筆記本電腦）和最後更新日期（如“2個月=死掉的）。

    I would add “or background image” to “lame or otherwise off-putting avatar”.我想補充“或背景圖像”的“跛腳或以其他方式把將化身”。

    To your list of lame words I'd add 'social media consultant'.為了您的列表跛的話我要補充的社會媒體顧問'。 'Maven' and 'entrepreneur' okay by me. 'Maven的'和'企業家'好吧我。

  • Monica Diaz 莫尼卡迪亞茲 // May 10, 2009 at 3:31 am / / 09年5月10日在上午03點31分

    Well, probably I am not so scientific about it, but I go see their tweets, to check if I would like them coming up in my timeline.那麼，也許我不是這樣的科學對，但我去看看他們的啁啾聲，以檢查是否我希望他們今後在我的時間表。 Sometimes, the bio looks interesing but the tweets don't add value to me.有時，生物看起來interesing但鳴叫不增值我。 I have people I do not follow, but just search from time to time to see what they are up to…我的人我不跟進，但只搜索不時看看他們會這樣...

  • David Bradley 大衛布拉德利 // May 10, 2009 at 10:13 am / / 09年5月10日在上午10時13

    Very grateful for all the retweets and stumbles the community is giving my Twitter decision flowchart.非常感謝所有的retweets和磕磕絆絆的社會給我的Twitter的決定流程圖。 It's gratifying that people are finding it so entertaining or useful, despite it being highly simplistic, very subjective, and rather more than a little tongue-in-cheek.令人欣慰的人都發現這樣有趣或有用的，儘管它高度簡單化，非常主觀的，而不是多一點舌頭在-臉頰。

    One twitter user一個嘰嘰喳喳用戶 @adavid @ adavid quite flatteringly referred to it as a Kalman filter for Twitter, which is cool.奉承相當提交給它一個Twitter的卡爾曼濾波器，這是很酷。

  • David Bradley 大衛布拉德利 // May 11, 2009 at 8:21 am / / 5月11日在上午8點21分

    Now, that the flowchart has been widely Stumbled and tweeted I've had some great feedback and now updated with version 2.0 It now includes a BLOCK filter for deciding what to do with spammers.現在，流程圖已廣泛絆了一下，啾啾我已經有一些很好的意見，現在更新2.0版現在它包括一個BLOCK篩選決定如何處理垃圾郵件發送者。 It also includes a decision box re the content of the putative followee's tweets.它還包括一項決定中的內容重新假定的followee的啁啾聲。 Also, I modified the guru/expert decision box to get across the real point I'm making about the use of stupid phrases like “social media marketing expert raconteur guru”另外，我修改了大師/專家的決定中得到真正的點上，我作出有關使用愚蠢的詞組“社會媒體營銷專家健談大師”

    Thanks again for all the input via twitter and email!再次感謝所有的輸入通過Twitter和電子郵件！

  • Oleksandr Shturmov 亞歷山大Shturmov // May 11, 2009 at 8:23 am / / 5月11日在上午08時23分

    Could you define “lame or otherwise off-putting avatar”?你能定義“跛腳或以其他方式把將化身”？ Perhaps give some examples of good bios while you're at it?也許舉出一些例子良好的BIOS，而你在嗎？

  • Karen James 卡倫詹姆斯 // May 11, 2009 at 11:46 am / / 5月11日在上午11時46分

    'lame or otherwise off-putting' avatars, for me, are: '跛腳或以其他方式把把'化身，對我來說，是：
    - no avatar -沒有頭像
    - naked avatar -裸頭像

  • David Bradley 大衛布拉德利 // May 11, 2009 at 11:46 am / / 5月11日在上午11時46分

    Heheheh. Heheheh。 Why would I do that Oleksandr?為什麼我會做亞歷山大？ Those terms are deliberately highly subjective as is the whole flowchart, it's meant to be a bit of fun rather than a definitive way to choose who you should follow back.這些條件是非常主觀故意，是整個流程，這意味著有少許的樂趣，而不是最終的方法來選擇你應該遵循誰回來。 So, when you “run” it yourself, you'll have to define what you personally feel is lame and what is a good bio…and make those decisions for yourself所以，當你“運行”自己動手，你必須確定你自己覺得是跛的，什麼是一個很好的生物...並作出自己的決定 ;-) Of course, anyone can see that someone following 1247 tweeps who has only half a dozen followers, a default avatar, and an empty bio is either stoopid or a spammer, or both, so it does work in general too.當然，任何人都可以看到，下面的人誰1247 tweeps只有六七個追隨者，一個默認的頭像，和一個空的生物要么是stoopid或垃圾郵件，或兩者兼而有之，所以它的一般工作了。

  • David Bradley 大衛布拉德利 // May 11, 2009 at 11:53 am / / 5月11日在上午11時53分

    Out-of-focus often puts me off…as does an avatar for an individual that has someone else in the frame, how are we to know which is the tweep and which is just their fwend?外的焦點，常常使我送行...一樣化身為個人，有別人在框架內，我們如何知道哪些是tweep，哪些只是他們fwend？

  • Karen James 卡倫詹姆斯 // May 11, 2009 at 11:57 am / / 5月11日在上午11時57分

    Case in point:案例分析：
    http://twitter.com/ http://twitter.com/ TrondheimTravel TrondheimTravel

  • Twitter Search 嘰嘰喳喳搜索 // May 27, 2009 at 3:47 am / / 2009年5月27日在上午03時47分

    thats great that you are talking about the twitter api,a good example of searching with the twitter api is on twiogle.com because you can search on twitter and google at the same time.多數民眾贊成很大，你所談論的Twitter的API，一個很好的例子的探索與Twitter的API是twiogle.com，因為你可以搜索和谷歌上嘰嘰喳喳在同一時間。

  • Lisa // Sep 22, 2009 at 5:51 pm 麗莎 / / 2009年9月22日在下午5時51分

    If there were lame words like maven in the bio, then why would you answer yes to the question “good bio?” Seems like that is a superfluous step in your chart.如果有跛腳Maven的字眼，在生物，那麼你為什麼要回答的問題是“良好的生物？”看起來這是一個多餘的步驟，在您的圖表。

  • David Bradley 大衛布拉德利 // Sep 22, 2009 at 6:34 pm / / 2009年9月22日在下午6時34分

    Yeah, okay…I never said it was perfekt是啊，好的...我從來沒有說過這是佩費克特 ;-)

  • Kate Smith 凱特史密斯 // Oct 6, 2009 at 9:59 pm / / 2009年10月6日在下午9點59分

    Nice flow chart and in my logic for follow/don't follow is pretty similar.尼斯流程圖和我的邏輯後續/不走的很相似。 I however made the 'faux pas' of using colorexpert after a well-known marketing 'guru'然而，我提出的'失禮'使用colorexpert後，著名的營銷'大師' ;-) said I'd be crazy not to since that is how I am commonly referred to in the media, etc. (especially since I have a very common name.)說我是瘋了，因為這不，我是如何俗稱媒體等（尤其是因為我有一個很普通的名字。）

    Now with over 1600 followers I really don't want to change.目前擁有超過1600追隨者我真的不想改變。 So what's a gal to do to let the world know I don't take myself too seriously or with as you say 'a sense of irony' about it?那麼一個加侖做才能讓世界知道我不會把自己看得太重，或與你說'某種意義上說，具有諷刺意味的'什麼呢？

  • David Bradley 大衛布拉德利 // Oct 7, 2009 at 7:54 am / / 2009年10月7日在上午07點54

    @Kate I don't think using the word “expert” unless it starts with an “s” is particularly scurrilous, but if you'd said “color guru”… @凱特我不認為用的是“專家”，除非它從一個“s”特別下流，但如果你說“顏色大師”...

  • Kate Smith 凱特史密斯 // Oct 9, 2009 at 12:05 am / / 2009年10月9日在上午12點05分

    LOL, love your quick wit David.洛爾愛你的機智大衛。 Thanks for the response.感謝響應。

  • Ed Beerwart // Nov 4, 2009 at 6:10 pm 埃德Beerwart / / 2009年11月4日在下午6點10分

    I like this chart.我喜歡這個圖表。 It has improved my life, and now I understand what twitter is all about.它提高了我的生活，現在我明白嘰嘰喳喳是什麼。 <3 “3

Leave a Comment發表評論






← ← The Twitter Book Twitter的書 Wordpress, X Days from Now WordPress的，從現在起X天 → →