Sciencetext提示和技巧

Tech talk, social media, computing tips and tricks 技术讲座，社会媒体，计算技巧和窍门

Twitter Decision Flowchart Twitter的决策流程图

May 7th, 2009 · by David Bradley >> 2009年5月7日·由大卫布拉德利“” 30 Comments 30评论

twitter-decision-flowchart1 Twitter is the place to be online and tips abound. Twitter的是地方可在线进行并提示比比皆是。 But, how do you decide whether to follow someone who has followed you?但是，你如何决定是否跟进的人谁也跟着你？ There are some basic filters you can use, like not following back obvious spammers and scammers and generally not following people with protected tweets unless you know them already.有一些基本的过滤，可以使用下面好像没有明显的垃圾邮件和回诈骗者一般不遵循与保护鸣叫的人，除非你知道他们已经。

Anyway, I've created a flowchart to help you decide whether to follow someone who followed you on Twitter (click the image to get a fullsize view).无论如何，我创建了一个流程图来帮助你决定是否跟进的人谁后您在Twitter（按图获得全萤幕视图）。 Incidentally, I am not quite so strict as this flowchart implies so please do follow me as顺便说一句，我没有那么严格，因为这意味着流程图所以请不要跟着我的 @sciencebase @ sciencebase : ：

twitter-decision-flowchart1

I asked我问 (Anti)Social Development blogger （反）社会发展的Blogger Kim Woodbridge金伍德布里奇 for her editorial thoughts on the Twitter flowchart before publishing, and so the decision diamond for avatar/photo assessment is more lenient than it was.就在公布Twitter的流程图，她编辑的想法，所以决定为头像钻石/照片评价是比它更宽松了。 It was Kim that mentioned locked tweeps too, although I didn't embed that thought process into the flow diagram.这是金的锁定tweeps也提到，虽然我没有嵌入这种思想到流程图的过程。

30 responses so far ↓ 30答复迄今↓

  • Kim Woodbridge 金伍德布里奇 // May 7, 2009 at 4:53 pm 下午/ / 09年5月7日在4:53

    Hi David – Thanks for letting me know you had posted it.您好大卫-你让我知道你把它贴感谢。 When I commented on a couple of articles yesterday I was actually looking to see if this was available yet.当我评论的文章的夫妇昨天我其实，看看这是否是尚未推向市场。

    I hope others stop by and let you know if their thought process is similar to this one.我希望其他人制止，并让你知道，如果他们的思维过程是类似的。

  • David Bradley 大卫布拉德利 // May 7, 2009 at 5:23 pm 下午/ / 09年5月7日在5:23

    Yeah, already had some good tweets about it…是的，已经对一些很好的鸣叫...

  • Rudy 鲁迪 // May 7, 2009 at 5:26 pm 下午/ / 09年5月7日在5:26

    You don't follow anyone who follows over 50 people?你不遵守谁人以上50人以下？ Seems a little harsh to me.似乎有点苛刻，我。 :-)

  • David Bradley 大卫布拉德利 // May 7, 2009 at 5:35 pm 下午/ / 09年5月7日下午5:35

    Hah…no, only if they're following >> 50 and have Followers = 0 Should I have used a combined box do you think?哈...没有，只有当他们下面的“”50，并追随者= 0我是否应该用结合框你觉得呢？ Those tweeps are usually spammers…这些tweeps通常是垃圾邮件发送者...

  • Rudy 鲁迪 // May 7, 2009 at 5:39 pm 下午/ / 09年5月7日5时39

    Ah, that's right, I missed the Followers = 0 box.啊，没错，我错过了追随者= 0框。 However, chances are spammers will hit a few people who runs auto-follow, so they'll have at least 1 follower.但是，机会是垃圾邮件发送者将达到少数人谁运行自动跟随，因此他们将至少有1追随者。

  • David Bradley 大卫布拉德利 // May 7, 2009 at 5:41 pm 下午/ / 09年5月7日在5:41

    Ooh, that's a point.噢，这是一个问题。 It's a general rule of thumb though.这是一个一般的经验，但。 If someone is following 1846 followers but has just half a dozen people following them back, they're probably not likely to be the most engaging of tweeps.如果有人是1846年之后的追随者，但只有半十几人回来后，他们很可能不会是tweeps最迷人。

  • Tracy 特雷西 // May 7, 2009 at 6:56 pm 下午/ / 09年5月7日在6:56

    It cracks me up to think that there are probably significant numbers of spammers whose following list consists only of other spammers having these Tweetlater-enabled monologues at each other.这裂缝我到认为有可能是大量的垃圾邮件发送者的下面只列出这些Tweetlater有其他垃圾包括支持对方独白。

    I bet somebody who is smart and science fiction-y could right a fine novel about that.我敢打赌，谁是聪明人的科幻小说，辎可右一个关于小说的罚款。

  • David Bradley 大卫布拉德利 // May 7, 2009 at 7:23 pm 下午/ / 09年5月7日在7:23

    I think you're right Tracy, in fact didn't somebody do a spoof on April 1 about email systems sending autoreplies to messages and automated responses being sent back and so on ad infinitum?我认为你是对的麦蒂，其实并没有人这样做对4月1日发送的邮件自动回覆和自动响应电子邮件系统一欺诈被送回并循环往复呢？

  • Kim Woodbridge 金伍德布里奇 // May 7, 2009 at 7:29 pm 下午/ / 09年5月7日在7:29

    @Tracy – Ok – that is the funniest thing I've read all day @特雷西-玉-这是最有趣的一件事我读过一天 :-) It sort of sounds like a possible Cory Doctorow novel.它有点像小说可能科利多克托罗的声音。

  • Mike Nichols 迈克尼科尔斯 // May 8, 2009 at 3:49 am 上午/ / 2009年5月8日在3:49

    Your reasoning in the flow chart matches mine to the “T.”你在比赛推理流程图矿井的“吨”

    I've tweeted with lots of people who think that if you don't follow everybody, you're a snob.我已经同人民啾啾谁认为，如果你不按照大家，你是一个势利手。

    Not so.并非如此。 I've got only limited time, and I think that choosing to follow those I think will make best use of that time is the smart way to go.只是我有时间限制，我认为选择遵循这些，我认为会尽力的，当时使用的是最聪明的办法去。

    Thanks for a great decision tree!感谢伟大的决策树！

  • Yuri Alkin 尤里正炜 // May 8, 2009 at 5:25 am 上午/ / 2009年5月8日在5:25

    Great and useful chart.大和有用的图表。 It'd be good to showcase it Twitter site — almost all new Twitter users would benefit from it.它很适合展示给大家看Twitter网站-几乎所有的新Twitter的用户将受益于它。 Better yet, some parts of this logic can be implemented as part of “follow” button code, so that people trying to follow a spam account would get warning (obviously that'd be an opt-in feature).更好的是，这种逻辑的某些部分可以实现为部分“遵循”按钮的代码，使人们试图沿着一条垃圾邮件的帐户会得到警告（显然是想成为选择加入功能）。 The logic of this chart would fail to catch a more sophisticated spam accounts (“twitterators” and “twones” whose evolution I've been following on my blog此图的逻辑将无法赶上更先进的垃圾邮件帐户（“twitterators”和“twones”，其演变之后我一直在我的博客 http://bit.ly/6akmW) http://bit.ly/6akmW） , but it can be certainly extended. ，但是可以肯定延长。

  • David Bradley 大卫布拉德利 // May 8, 2009 at 8:16 am 上午/ / 2009年5月8日在20:16:00

    @Yuri I don't think we'd need to use the Twitter API to run this flowchart, I'm sure some clever programmer could create a Greasemonkey script that would do the job of filtering and perhaps have variable parameters. @尤里我不认为我们就需要使用Twitter的API来运行此流程图，我肯定有一些聪明的程序员可以创建一个Greasemonkey脚本，将做好过滤工作，这也许是可变参数。

    @Mike Yeah, who's got time to follow everybody? @迈克是啊，谁的时间按照每个人？ Moreover, when you're providing regular news a lot of followers are following simply to keep up to date with what you're offering, they don't necessarily want to engage and stop by for a chat anyway.此外，当您定期提供消息的追随者很多下面只是为了跟上您提供的服务，到目前为止，他们并不一定想参与并停止聊天也被。

  • Dr Shock MD PhD 医学博士博士休克 // May 8, 2009 at 8:20 pm 下午/ / 2009年5月8日在8:20

    Nice, completely agree.尼斯，完全同意。 Also value a link to a blog or website for some information, some bio's are just not ensuring enough.也值到博客或某些信息网站链接，一些生物的，只是没有足够的保障。 So after bio> landing page >yes>follow所以在生物“目标网页”是“跟进
    Kind regards Dr Shock亲切的问候休克博士

  • David Bradley 大卫布拉德利 // May 9, 2009 at 8:44 am 上午/ / 2009年5月9日在8:44

    Yes, I usually check out a person's link too.是的，我通常签出一个人的联系了。 If it turns out to be a long-form marketing web page selling some scammy nonsense, they get blocked.如果证明是一项长期的营销网页的形式出售部分scammy胡说八道，他们被封锁。

  • Karen James 卡伦詹姆斯 // May 10, 2009 at 12:53 am 上午/ / 2009年5月10日12时53

    Ditto on checking the link, plus several other tweaks:同上检查环节上，加上一些其它的改进：

    Number of updates (if 1, then I scrutinise for spam-like qualities, eg free laptop) and the date of last update (if >2 months=defunct).数更新（如果1，那么我对垃圾邮件的审核般的素质，如免费笔记本电脑）和最后更新日期（如“2个月=死掉的）。

    I would add “or background image” to “lame or otherwise off-putting avatar”.我想补充“或背景图像”的“跛脚或以其他方式把将化身”。

    To your list of lame words I'd add 'social media consultant'.为了您的跛单词列表我要补充的社会媒体顾问'。 'Maven' and 'entrepreneur' okay by me. 'Maven的'和'企业家'好吧我。

  • Monica Diaz 莫尼卡迪亚兹 // May 10, 2009 at 3:31 am 上午/ / 2009年5月10日在3:31

    Well, probably I am not so scientific about it, but I go see their tweets, to check if I would like them coming up in my timeline.那么，也许我不是这样的科学对，但我去看看他们的啁啾声，以检查是否我希望他们今后在我的时间了。 Sometimes, the bio looks interesing but the tweets don't add value to me.有时，生物看起来interesing但鸣叫不增值我。 I have people I do not follow, but just search from time to time to see what they are up to…我的人我不遵守，只是不时搜寻，看看他们会这样...

  • David Bradley 大卫布拉德利 // May 10, 2009 at 10:13 am 上午/ / 2009年5月10日在10:13

    Very grateful for all the retweets and stumbles the community is giving my Twitter decision flowchart.非常感谢所有的retweets和磕磕绊绊的社会给我的Twitter的决定流程图。 It's gratifying that people are finding it so entertaining or useful, despite it being highly simplistic, very subjective, and rather more than a little tongue-in-cheek.令人欣慰的人都发现这样有趣或有用的是，虽然高度简单化，非常主观的，而不是更小舌头在-脸颊。

    One twitter user一个叽叽喳喳用户 @adavid @ adavid quite flatteringly referred to it as a Kalman filter for Twitter, which is cool.不少奉承提到类似Twitter的，这是冷静卡尔曼滤波。

  • David Bradley 大卫布拉德利 // May 11, 2009 at 8:21 am 上午/ / 5月11日在8时21分

    Now, that the flowchart has been widely Stumbled and tweeted I've had some great feedback and now updated with version 2.0 It now includes a BLOCK filter for deciding what to do with spammers.现在，流程图已广泛绊了一下，啾啾我已经有一些很好的意见，现在的2.0版更新现在它包括决定如何处理垃圾邮件过滤器座。 It also includes a decision box re the content of the putative followee's tweets.它还包括一项决定中重新对假定followee的鸣叫内容。 Also, I modified the guru/expert decision box to get across the real point I'm making about the use of stupid phrases like “social media marketing expert raconteur guru”另外，我修改了大师/专家的决定中得到真正的点上，我对诸如“社会媒体营销专家健谈大师愚蠢的短语使用决策”

    Thanks again for all the input via twitter and email!所有通过Twitter和电子邮件的投入再次感谢！

  • Oleksandr Shturmov 亚历山大Shturmov // May 11, 2009 at 8:23 am 上午/ / 09年5月11日在8:23

    Could you define “lame or otherwise off-putting avatar”?你能定义“跛脚或以其他方式把将化身”？ Perhaps give some examples of good bios while you're at it?也许给出正确的BIOS的一些例子，而您是在它？

  • Karen James 卡伦詹姆斯 // May 11, 2009 at 11:46 am 上午/ / 09年5月11日在11:46

    'lame or otherwise off-putting' avatars, for me, are: '跛脚或以其他方式把把'化身对我来说，是：
    - no avatar -没有头像
    - naked avatar -裸头像

  • David Bradley 大卫布拉德利 // May 11, 2009 at 11:46 am 上午/ / 09年5月11日在11:46

    Heheheh. Heheheh。 Why would I do that Oleksandr?为什么我会做亚历山大？ Those terms are deliberately highly subjective as is the whole flowchart, it's meant to be a bit of fun rather than a definitive way to choose who you should follow back.这些条件是非常主观故意，是整个流程，它的原本应该是一点乐趣，而不是最终的方法来选择你应该遵循谁回来。 So, when you “run” it yourself, you'll have to define what you personally feel is lame and what is a good bio…and make those decisions for yourself所以，当你“运行”自己动手，你必须确定你自己觉得是跛的，什么是一个很好的生物...并自己作出的决定 ;-) Of course, anyone can see that someone following 1247 tweeps who has only half a dozen followers, a default avatar, and an empty bio is either stoopid or a spammer, or both, so it does work in general too.当然，任何人都可以看到，下面的人谁1247 tweeps只有六七个追随者，一个默认的头像，和一个空的生物要么是stoopid或垃圾邮件，或两者兼而有之，所以它一般也工作。

  • David Bradley 大卫布拉德利 // May 11, 2009 at 11:53 am 上午/ / 09年5月11日在11:53

    Out-of-focus often puts me off…as does an avatar for an individual that has someone else in the frame, how are we to know which is the tweep and which is just their fwend?外的焦点，常常使我送行...一样化身为个人，已有人在画面一样，我们如何知道哪些是tweep，哪些只是他们fwend？

  • Karen James 卡伦詹姆斯 // May 11, 2009 at 11:57 am 上午/ / 09年5月11日11时57

    Case in point:案例分析：
    http://twitter.com/ http://twitter.com/ TrondheimTravel TrondheimTravel

  • Twitter Search 叽叽喳喳搜索 // May 27, 2009 at 3:47 am 上午/ / 2009年5月27日在3:47

    thats great that you are talking about the twitter api,a good example of searching with the twitter api is on twiogle.com because you can search on twitter and google at the same time.多数民众赞成很大，您对Twitter的API，在与Twitter的API搜索很好的例子说，因为你可以在Twitter和谷歌搜索在同一时间twiogle.com。

  • Lisa // Sep 22, 2009 at 5:51 pm 下午 丽莎 / / 2009年9月22日在17:51:00

    If there were lame words like maven in the bio, then why would you answer yes to the question “good bio?” Seems like that is a superfluous step in your chart.如果有像生物Maven的跛脚的话，那么你为什么要回答的问题是“良好的生物？”看起来这是一个在您的图表多余的步骤。

  • David Bradley 大卫布拉德利 // Sep 22, 2009 at 6:34 pm 下午/ / 2009年9月22日在18:34:00

    Yeah, okay…I never said it was perfekt是啊，好的...我从来没有说过这是佩费克特 ;-)

  • Kate Smith 凯特史密斯 // Oct 6, 2009 at 9:59 pm 下午/ / 2009年10月6号在9:59

    Nice flow chart and in my logic for follow/don't follow is pretty similar.尼斯流程图，并以我作逻辑/不走的很相似。 I however made the 'faux pas' of using colorexpert after a well-known marketing 'guru'然而，我提出的'失礼使用colorexpert'后，著名的营销'大师' ;-) said I'd be crazy not to since that is how I am commonly referred to in the media, etc. (especially since I have a very common name.)说我是疯了，因为这不，我是如何俗称媒体等（尤其是因为我有一个很普通的名字。）

    Now with over 1600 followers I really don't want to change.目前拥有超过1600追随者我真的不想改变。 So what's a gal to do to let the world know I don't take myself too seriously or with as you say 'a sense of irony' about it?那么一个加仑做才能让世界知道我不会把自己看得太重，或正如你所说的'讽刺意义的是关于'？

  • David Bradley 大卫布拉德利 // Oct 7, 2009 at 7:54 am 上午/ / 2009年10月7日在7:54

    @Kate I don't think using the word “expert” unless it starts with an “s” is particularly scurrilous, but if you'd said “color guru”… @凯特我不认为用的是“专家”，除非它与一个“s”特别下流，但如果你说“颜色大师”开始...

  • Kate Smith 凯特史密斯 // Oct 9, 2009 at 12:05 am 上午/ / 09年10月9日在12:05

    LOL, love your quick wit David.洛尔爱你的机智大卫。 Thanks for the response.感谢响应。

  • Ed Beerwart // Nov 4, 2009 at 6:10 pm 埃德Beerwart 下午/ / 2009年11月4日在6:10

    I like this chart.我喜欢这个图表。 It has improved my life, and now I understand what twitter is all about.它提高了我的生活，现在我明白叽叽喳喳是什么。 <3 “3

Leave a Comment发表评论






← ← The Twitter Book Twitter的书 Wordpress, X Days from Now WordPress的，从现在起X天 → →