Is it wrong to mention your twitter count?
June 7th, 2010 by David Bradley >> 7 Comments
UPDATE: 3 September 2011 we passed 11,000 some time ago and are now nudging towards 12,000. Earlier this week, Twittercounter suggested it would take 8844 days to reach 100,000 followers. Today, it’s halved that estimate, still several years to got before we reach a tenth of the follower count of the likes of Stephen Fry!
UPDATE: 7 July 2011 2 tweeps short of 11,000 as of time of writing
UPDATE: 9 June 2011 One year one, my count passed 10,000 a few weeks ago (25th March) and is fast approaching 11,000. As of the time of writing and with current growth rate that should occur in 18 days. Puts me at about 37,000th out of all twitter users ordered by count alone. I’ve posted almost 9000 times since I joined Twitter in June 2007. All of which is totally meaningless and irrelevant to everyone else, isn’t it?
Is it wrong to mention your Twitter count? A week or so ago, my @sciencebase twitter account was slowly edging towards 7000 followers, as of this weekend, it passed that number, which is nice.
Of course, I’m pretty sure there will be many among that number who are not following me because they want to engage, but because they’re hoping to gain some kind of marketing advantage (they’re spammers, SEO gurus, affiliate experts and the like). I’m also pretty sure that most of them follow me because for a moment, however fleeting, they actually wanted to read what I have to say, or at least argue that I’m wrong.
So, first, thank you to all my genuine followers and apologies if I don’t immediately follow you back when you join. Even with lists, searches, and filters it would be very hard to keep on top of the streams from such numbers of people, and it’s not like my count is even a fraction of the size of Stephen Fry’s, say.
When my count stood at 6982 or thereabouts, I mentioned (in a tweet) that although the number is probably quite meaningless in various ways, I was also looking forward to reaching the 7000 landmark. Why wouldn’t I? Well, one erstwhile follower took deep offence at what he saw as me simply marketing myself and grasping at new followers and within hours of my tweet unfollowed me and told me so.
His very high following to follower ratio was rather suspicious, so I suspect he’s just some curmudgeon and I’m quite happy not to have followers like that. The natural progression of a twitter account is for followers to accumulate, gradually, organically, I certainly wasn’t in any way desperate to gather another 18 followers, just curious to see who would join as my count approached 7000.
There are, of course, lots of ways to artificially inflate your twitter count, they’re all pointless if you’re using twitter for the genuine purpose of engagement with your fellow members. I suppose that for someone hoping simply to market themselves or their company adding more and more followers makes the account look more significant, and they might go for those techniques, but if all you’re doing is selling, you are not going to get anywhere useful shouting at artificial followers.
A quote from Mark Schaefer on the blog “Grow” suggests that those of us building genuine follower numbers should be proud of the achievement:
If you’ve built your meaningful and relevant audience carefully, why wouldn’t bigger be better? Why not learn more, make more friends, build more connections?
I must say, I have to agree. For years, almost every blog on the block had a Feedburner count display button and no one seemed to complain about that, so what’s the difference with mentioning one’s twitter count? We all want more followers on social media sites, otherwise, what’s the point? Chris Brogan says something similar. If mentioning that number gives added credence to your feed and attracts potential new followers because they see the crowd gathering, so be it. But, that wasn’t my intention anyway, Just thought it worth 140 characters (out of the millions I type) to mention the fact.
When Twitter temporarily reset everyone’s count to zero, that became almost the only topic of conversation for hours…seems people really do care about their twitter count. If my unfollower didn’t why would he have responded so?

"Deceived Wisdom: Why What You Thought Was Right Is Wrong" from David Bradley. Available now on 


Leave a comment ↓
Renato // Jun 7, 2010 at 6:33 pm
It’s allright, David.
I was there on your 6982 count moment. And I have even made a not very funny joke about it.
But I understood it well. But reaching 7000 was not sooo meaningless. You deserve compliments as it is a clear sign that what you post worths reading.
And it did surely worth to be mentioned among your (many) followers. Nothing wrong about that.
Jill G // Jun 7, 2010 at 10:43 pm
It’s weird, I use twitter accounts for various websites. I have one for my personal use and within my handle are the 3 letters “seo.” I don’t even really use this account, I never got around to it. Yet every day, more and more people are following me. I have done nothing to promote it and I only have a handful of tweets and follow less than 40 people. Crazy!
David Bradley // Jun 8, 2010 at 7:32 am
Thanks for the ongoing support Renato. Certainly more meaningful than any number is to know that there are people, like you, actually reading my stuff and responding to it
I cannot even remember the handle for the guy who complained
Danielle // Jun 9, 2010 at 8:09 pm
I think that is crazy. Why would anyone take offense to a number!! That is just silly!
Jo Brodie // Jun 10, 2010 at 12:06 pm
I think I see what you mean – I suppose it could be seen as a bit gauche to brag about how many followers one has (or a bit cult like) although I’m at the stage where I can’t pretend not to have noticed I’m nearly at 1,000 followers
As far as I’m aware all of my followers are genuine, some many have slipped through the net, as I’ve been blocking most of them since I joined Twitter a couple of years ago. Records suggest I’ve pruned around 1,500 (!) so I am pretty harsh on spammers and bots and the random people who are just following people in the hope they’ll follow back. Or people who follow me because I’ve mentioned a keyword they like in a one-off tweet.
It seems to be a mildly useful thing to get a snapshot of how large someone’s reach is, but I’m surprised that anyone would take offense at it. That is a bit odd.
I only really want to be followed by people that I’d follow myself if it was practically possible. Thank goodness for Tweetdeck separating the tweetstream by the topics I’ve chosen!!
Jo
David Bradley // Jun 10, 2010 at 1:31 pm
Well, of the approximately 7000, only one person complained, I just fancied writing about twitter again, so used his snarkiness as an excuse.
David Bradley // Jan 19, 2012 at 1:58 pm
15th February 2011 – 8817 followers.
19th January 2012 – 14532
At current rate should reach 15,000 by end of January and 100,000 in just 7 years