Tequila Mocking (Bird)龍舌蘭酒嘲弄（鳥）

I’m currently writing an article about the chemical analysis of tequila for my我目前寫了一篇關於化學分析的龍舌蘭酒為我 chemistry news化學新聞 webzine Reactive Reports.雜誌反應的報告。 I did the usual scan of Wikipedia to get some basic info on this agave-based spirit and found a nice picture taken on a Canon Digital Rebel - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Tequila-sunny-window.jpg我一貫的掃描文字得到的一些基本信息就這龍舌蘭為基礎的精神和發現了尼斯圖片所採取的對佳能數碼叛軍-h ttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/image:tequila-sunny-window。 JPG格式

Apparently, the photographer shot this image at a shutter speed of 1/60 second.很顯然，攝影師拍攝的形象，這在快門速度1 / 60秒。 All well and good, but then in their wisdom the wiki editors have decreed that this value (which is standard format throughout the photography world, should be reproduced in decimal too. So, we have the ridiculous value of 0.0166666666667 given for the shutter speed too. Why did they cut it off at so few significant figures? Probably that’s as much as their calculator displayed when they divided 1 by 60!以及所有和良好的，但隨後在他們的智慧這個wiki的編輯已頒布法令，此值（這是標準格式，整個攝影世界，應該是轉載於小數也，所以，我們有荒謬的價值0.0166666666667給予快門速度太為什麼他們就打斷送行，使數顯著的數字？大概的高達他們的計算器時所顯示的，他們分為1 60 ！

More to the point, who would want to know this value in decimal anyway, there’s no dial on any camera, anywhere in the world that doesn’t just say 1/60 for the shutter speed this sig fig rich value represents.更多一點，誰不想知道這個值在小數點無論如何，有沒有撥號就任何相機，在世界上任何地方，這並不只是說1 / 60為快門速度，這SIG的圖豐富的價值。 Moreover, there’s no way shutter speed could be measured to that degree of accuracy on any standard camera you could buy!此外，還有的沒有出路的快門速度可以衡量這一準確度就任何標準來衡量，相機，你可以購買！