Comments on: Spam Analysis http://www.sciencetext.com/spam-analysis.html Sciencetext Tech Talk, PC tips, blog hacks, browsing, blogging, social media Mon, 15 Mar 2010 08:01:38 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: David Bradley http://www.sciencetext.com/spam-analysis.html/comment-page-1#comment-84551 David Bradley Tue, 19 Aug 2008 18:04:20 +0000 http://www.sciencetext.com/?p=699#comment-84551 One of the most peculiar spam subject lines I saw recently read: "Heather to have other leg amputated". Nasty people. One of the most peculiar spam subject lines I saw recently read: “Heather to have other leg amputated”.

Nasty people.

]]> By: Phil Whelan http://www.sciencetext.com/spam-analysis.html/comment-page-1#comment-70520 Phil Whelan Thu, 26 Jun 2008 19:14:47 +0000 http://www.sciencetext.com/?p=699#comment-70520 Abaca approach sounds like an interesting. 99% is quite amazing! I'm going to check it. David, yes, we have an approach that uses even less mathematical analysis, using the idea that spammers are impatient. We slow down connections of unknown senders, and in doing so have found that most zombie machines sending the spam disconnect within a few seconds. Phil Whelans last blog post..<a href="http://mailchannels.com/node/109" rel="nofollow">Sign up for a MailChannels Email System Load Test</a> Abaca approach sounds like an interesting. 99% is quite amazing! I’m going to check it.

David, yes, we have an approach that uses even less mathematical analysis, using the idea that spammers are impatient. We slow down connections of unknown senders, and in doing so have found that most zombie machines sending the spam disconnect within a few seconds.

Phil Whelans last blog post..Sign up for a MailChannels Email System Load Test

]]> By: David Bradley http://www.sciencetext.com/spam-analysis.html/comment-page-1#comment-70258 David Bradley Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:18:15 +0000 http://www.sciencetext.com/?p=699#comment-70258 Sounds like an interesting approach that saves on all this mathematical analysis. Anyone else got a good system in place that works as well as Abaca? Sounds like an interesting approach that saves on all this mathematical analysis. Anyone else got a good system in place that works as well as Abaca?

]]> By: andrew http://www.sciencetext.com/spam-analysis.html/comment-page-1#comment-70247 andrew Wed, 25 Jun 2008 15:51:33 +0000 http://www.sciencetext.com/?p=699#comment-70247 I read an article about a new technology called ReceiverNet from Abaca. ReceiverNet technology characterizes each protected user based on the percentage of spam they receive and then uses those reputations to rate the incoming message flow. I changed my spam filtering system to Abaca’s Email Protection Gateway and it blocked Replica watches spam mails, Subpoena Phishing mails and many more. I found that Abaca’s ReceiverNet service has 99% efficiency in blocking spam mails and they guarantee their results . For more information, log on to http://abaca.com/. I read an article about a new technology called ReceiverNet from Abaca. ReceiverNet technology characterizes each protected user based on the percentage of spam they receive and then uses those reputations to rate the incoming message flow. I changed my spam filtering system to Abaca’s Email Protection Gateway and it blocked Replica watches spam mails, Subpoena Phishing mails and many more. I found that Abaca’s ReceiverNet service has 99% efficiency in blocking spam mails and they guarantee their results . For more information, log on to http://abaca.com/.

]]>