A musician’s perspective on music piracy
September 28th, 2010 by David Bradley >> 7 Comments
The old music industry model of A&R musos hanging out at gigs and spotting upcoming talent, signing them up for lucrative (for the record company) record deals, screwing the acts for studio time and wrapping them up in legal red tape lingers on. But, music “piracy” has given young and aspiring artists yet another headache by turning the music industry on its head and denying many of them who lack the business nous a future in music.
Social networking for musicians
Many acts, such as Madonna, have jumped off the recording-touring turntable and are opting to get their music to their fans anyway they can and performing live to cover costs, although even that approach isn’t necessarily working with worldwide tickets sales down for many acts. This is, of course, much more feasible for a legacy act as their fans generally buy tickets and those demographics still like to go to shows. New, younger, and indie artists have a much harder time because the younger people don’t necessarily want to go to a show, especially if it is of someone who is not ‘famous’. For many solo indie pop acts, all costs have to be fronted by the act and there is then the hurdle of actually booking a venue.
Canadian power trio Rush have taken a half-way stance on this by releasing two tracks off their next album ahead of their current tour of the Americas. Presumably, the rest of their album will follow once they tot up their ticket receipts, but it makes you wonder. Others like Radiohead are finding ever more creative ways to get their recorded music to their fans and to make a few beer vouchers along the way.
But, for artists with a lower profile than big name acts it is inevitable that they are going to be lost in the mass of media unless they can make the most of modern technology, such as social networking tools and crowd sourcing.
One such idealist is soulful Canadian singer-songwriter Natalie Brown. Natalie connected with me on Twitter a couple of years ago and we’ve chatted on and off about the world of social networking, music, and more over that time. She’s now hoping to subsidise her next recording project and a live DVD by persuading her fans to dig deep, well not so deep. She is utilising social fund-raising, Facebook and any other tool at her disposal to help her put out a Limited Edition Autographed CD (The Relationship Odyssey) & Live Show DVD.
Social fund raising
It’s an interesting idea, but Natalie still has some way to go before she reaches her target. One of the problems she tells me is that there’s lots of encouragement but the recession means that financial support has been slow in coming despite her best efforts in social media.
“Even using modern technology, you face overcrowding where the loudest wins, not necessary the most talented,” Natalie told me. “I know scores of fabulously talented people who are not into self-promotion or who are too shy or just not marketing savvy… what will happen to them? Imagine if Bob Dylan were up and coming now? There is NO WAY he would ever be heard.”
“I’m doing everything ‘right’ according to how they say to promote the project, so I am thinking that it’s the economy,” she says. “It’s either that or there just isn’t that much interest in actually financially supporting what I do. There’s plenty of interest to watch and stream though. People bug me if I don’t upload a weekly vlog, but they don’t seem to understand that there is a time and cost to everything that is done and one has to weigh up the outcome of that time/cost is in the grand scheme of things.”
Nevertheless, she has been growing her fan base for many years, so you’d think there would be interest. Perhaps there’s more to it though and Natalie has a pet theory about how the music industry, and the fan perspective has changed over the last few years, especially since the advent of illicit and illegal file sharing.
“What I’ve seen since getting online in 1996 is a decline in true fans online, there are more fans… but the fan mentality now is that ‘liking’ or ‘listening’ makes them a fan. Buying a product or going to a gig is what makes you a true fan, but fans these days don’t seem to think that way.”
Natalie laments the fact that the whole P2P post-Napster state of the music industry and perhaps even the RIAA legal activity has shifted things irreversibly. “Somehow online behavior has shifted and people think they are fans if they stream your music for free, or share it etc,” she adds. ” But we both know that a fan should be measured by how they support the act financially. I’m assuming that back in the day you would never have said you were a fan of The Beatles without owning a record, t-shirt, or concert ticket stub.”
Sticking it
“Fans say they are ‘sticking it to the man’ but at the end of the day, the reality is that in the major label system ‘the man’ will get his pay check,” adds Natalie, “but the artist is the one who ultimately suffers by not recouping what was invested in the recording and marketing and they never see a dime from their hard work and ultimately get dropped by the record label.” She points out that it’s worse for independent artists because they usually fund their own recording, manufacturing, marketing, touring etc. “So it’s like taking money right out of our pockets when you steal music or are content to stream for free (on our dime, because we pay for bandwidth costs),” she adds. “What people don’t realize is they are not sticking it to anyone except the artists. It’s time to rethink what it means to be a fan of music or any art that can be easily digitized and made freely available on the web or via mobile and other devices. What is a fan in 2010?”
Digital artists
“Couple that new mindset with the current crappy state of the economy and it’s a real shame because those of us who create art that can be digitized really suffer as a result,” Natalie says. The problem is perhaps one of value. “Sadly, digitization of all this stuff has created a glut of it, so it’s not precious any more. The value of anything goes down when there’s so much of it available for free given freely or pirated.”
The same problems are there for indie and major acts, Natalie suggests. Things are changing very rapidly, she says, “Our traditional sources of income are fading away, which ultimately means we cannot afford to create and perform unless we find other methods of creating income with the music we produce.” The A-listers can turn to celebrity endorsements but lesser known artists must turn to their creativity, which is exactly what Natalie is doing. “Where there is a will there is a way,” she says. “Nevertheless, it’s fascinating though, creating a music career in this time in our world. Everything shifts, changes and you must adapt!”
Natalie has been fortunate enough from her ventures into music licensing to build a recording studio and to make a living placing music. “I want to keep making and releasing music as long as I am able,” she says. “But I do have to sit back every so often and analyze if there is a return on certain efforts.” Natalie is in the fortunate position of having a core base of really great fans who she appreciates immensely and she is looking forward to releasing music for them in the future.
She is intrigued to see where all of these shifts in music consumption go. “Will music ultimately have to be free and we find other ways to make a living?” she asks. Regardless of the path music takes, Natalie knows that she will be there for the ride and hopefully always on the forefront of trying new things and educating fellow artists by sharing her experiences online.

"Deceived Wisdom: Why What You Thought Was Right Is Wrong" from David Bradley. Available now on 


Leave a comment ↓
Robert Slinn // Sep 28, 2010 at 2:09 pm
There is another female artiste on MySpace in a similar position but who performs at live gigs and pre-arranges (by social internet sites) to perform in fans individual own homes, if sufficient fans are present, is this a good approach for the future?
David Bradley // Sep 28, 2010 at 2:40 pm
I’m sure there are lots of musicians doing similar things. I don’t think much has changed really, if you think about it 99.99% of musicians play and record when there’s demand (the 1%, the U2, Oasis, Jay-Z etc get to pick and choose, but they’re analogous to any other elite group in society), the rest of us just have to make do.
Natalie // Sep 28, 2010 at 10:05 pm
This message is a reply to Robert Slim:
The home concert approach is a great idea for certain types of acts who do well in an acoustic setting. I’m not sure how profitable it is as I don’t know anyone well enough who does it to ask, but it certainly is a viable method of doing live shows if you are able to put your show into someones living room and make it work. It would not work for all genres of music however.
Krells // Sep 28, 2010 at 10:06 pm
Nice!were can i find the like-button or twitter-retweet-button
Matthias
David Bradley // Sep 28, 2010 at 10:16 pm
Right on the page, left of the post!
Robert Slinn // Sep 28, 2010 at 11:58 pm
Hi Natalie, Esther O’Connor (on MySpace and Facebook) is a Glaswegian and now does home concerts in addition to large outside gigs as well as some recording. I just thought that this is a good way forward and may be appropriate in your case.
Natalie // Sep 29, 2010 at 5:28 pm
@Robert oh that’s awesome. Unfortunately my sound does not suit the house concert environment. I do Pop/R&B/Funk/Soul and you need at the very minimum a 5 piece band. It really wouldn’t work doing this the house concert way as the sound needs to be amplified, drums are very loud in a house and it’s really not the right setting for what I do… I actually posted a few videos speaking about my show stuff if you care to check them out here:
PART 1:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=077xDY48kBs
PART 2:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mpUwuEpCAEg
Thanks for the suggestion tho! It definitely works for some kinds of music.
Take care,
Nat