Scraper Security刮板安全

Bloggers pretty much have to accept that scraper sites will steal their blog's content without permission for their own ends.博客幾乎都接受刮刀網站將竊取他們的博客的內容，未經允許自己的目的。 It happens all the time and if they don't just ignore it, then it can eat up far too much time as you worry about it and chase up the offenders asking them to cease and desist.它發生的時間，如果他們不只是不予理睬，那麼它可以吃了太多的時間，因為你擔心，並催促罪犯，要求他們停止和停止。 Avoiding the hassle was part of the reason I added a Creative Commons license to Sciencetext.com, saves me the trouble.避免麻煩是一部分原因，我加入了創作共用許可Sciencetext.com，省卻我的麻煩。

But every now and then, a scraper will use your content in a more creative way than is acceptable and basically recreate a new version of your site; that's not really on, it's called passing off and I've had at least three sites shut down for such a crime.但不時，刮板將使用您的內容更創造性地多，基本上是可以接受的創建一個新版本的網站，這不是真的，它被稱為假冒，我已經至少有3個站點關閉對這類犯罪的。 Other sites are just put together sloppily so that you end up with your Google Webmaster Tools error pages filling up with references to the broken links they produce because the scraper referred to non-existent entry points on your site.其它網站只是放在一起拖泥帶水，讓您與您的最終谷歌網站管理員工具的錯誤頁面填寫與提述損壞的鏈接，因為它們生產刮板提到不存在的切入點在您的網站。

I contacted one site that had generated such broken links recently.我所接觸的一個網站，已產生了這樣斷開的鏈接最近。 They were quite happy to remove the site from theirs, which is a shame, because I only wanted them to fix the links, to be honest.他們非常高興地從該網站刪除他們，這是一種恥辱，因為我只希望他們固定的聯繫，是誠實的。 They weren't doing anything too offensive with my work, after all, and it may have generated some new traffic.他們沒有太多的進攻做任何事情與我的工作，畢竟，它可能會產生一些新的交通。

It occurred to me, however, after they took my email to heart, that anyone could have approached them with the exact same complaint about any of the sites they were runnin.我想到，但是，在他們把我的電子郵件的心，任何人都可以走近他們具有完全相同的投訴，對任何地點，他們runnin。 Anyone…not necessarily me…I could have been an impostor with malicious intent looking to get a site deleted.任何人...不一定...我本來是騙子的惡意希望獲得網站刪除。

Most web forms and actionable systems on the net have some kind of verification to stop impostors subscribing or unsubscribing other people's accounts.大多數Web形式和可操作的系統網絡上有一些種核查阻止騙子訂閱或取消其他人的帳戶。 But, when a human is involved, it's down to discretion and that's when gamers and social engineers must rub their hands in glee.但是，當一個人的參與，這是到決定，這時候玩家和社會工程師必須用手擦在歡快。

I mentioned this to the webmaster who responded to my initial email, and they suggested, probably quite rightly, that I was being paranoid.我提出這個網絡管理員誰回答我最初的電子郵件，並且他們建議，可能非常正確，我被偏執。 They admitted they hadn't actually checked out the email, they had simply assumed that it really was me asking them to fix the links.他們承認，他們實際上並沒有簽出的電子郵件，他們簡單地認為真的是我要求他們修復的聯繫。 The webmaster went so far as to say that they “trust people by default.”網站管理員竟然說，他們“默認情況下信任的人。”

In this day and age with hackers, crackers, spammers and scammers everywhere you look, it is not a sensible stance to take.在這個時代的黑客，餅乾，垃圾郵件和欺詐隨處可見，這不是一個明智的立場可走。 Despite one's own integrity there are always people out there hoping to take advantage.儘管自己的誠信也總有人在那裡希望有機可乘。 Thoughts of game theory and humanity's upward and onward progression are totally irrelevant, I'm afraid, if someone has an ace up their sleeve or loaded dice in their pocket.博弈論的思考和人類向上，向前進展是完全不相干的，我很害怕，如果有人有一個王牌了他們的袖子或加載骰子在他們的口袋。