How Not to Keep your Subscriber Stats Secret
March 21st, 2007 · by David Bradley
![]()
Publicizing your blog’s subscriber base with one of those cutesy Feedburner animations, could be the worst thing you do for your blog unless you already have several hundred subscribers and even then some readers may simply feel your boasting. After all, if the number is low because you have only recently launched your blog, then new visitors who do not realize may simply think you have a low readership because the site is not worth reading, after all, they think, who wants to subscribe to a blog that no one reads? Once you have a few hundred, or a few thousand subscribers, then that question changes to, why didn’t I subscribe to this brilliant blog sooner, everyone else has?
So, you may be thinking, is that why ScienceText is not showing us the Feedburner chicklet? Well, it could well be, the site is relatively new, so subscriber numbers have not yet passed the safety threshold, once they do, I will implement the counter and let you all know just how many people are sharing the visitor experience with you.
Okay, so you’ve taken my advice and removed the counter from your blog, so how do you get to see your visitor numbers without logging into the feedburner dashboard every time. Well, before you remove the chicklet, save the code and make the line that looks like this - http://feeds.feedburner.com/~fc/Your-Blog?bg=000000&fg=00FF00&anim=1 - into a bookmark in your browser. Now, when you fancy checking up on your count, it is simply a matter of loading the bookmark, no need to login.
Just for interest, here are a few Feedburner counters for a few other sites that do display their subscriber numbers proudly regardless of size:
- Sciencebase
- SciScoop
- JohnTP
- Chaos Laboratory
- TechCrunch (yes, that’s
300k+400k+, 605,000!- Digital Inspiration
Smart ScienceText readers will by now have realized that even if a site has opted not to display its feedcount, there is a simple way to find out just how many subscribers the site has, all you need is the feed name and the URL I pasted above, simply swap out “Your-Blog” in that URL for the feed on which you want to spy. Of course, it relies on the blogger having enabled feedcount for their site. Actually displaying these images might be breaking somebody’s rules somewhere, so apologies if that’s the case. It surely cannot be breaking any T&Cs to use this URL trick offsite though.
Of course, I’ve essentially given the game away on Sciencetext (the feed is called Significant-Figures), as you can now look up our subscriber numbers. Just to emphasize, irrespective of the number of subscribers, the content here is we hope informative and entertaining enough that you will want to subscribe.
For a deeper discussion on whether or not to display your feed count check out Fighting to Stay Awake.

















8 responses so far ↓
Alpesh Nakar // Mar 28, 2007 at 3:33 am
Interesting.
Now up to 106. Content definitely matters…
I did start displaying with 1
Cheers!
David Bradley // Mar 28, 2007 at 6:41 am
That’s a nice jump. My main site started at 1250 (been around a while before we went to Feedburner) and has gradually increased by well over 1000 to 2248 (this morning) in three months. I display the stats on that site, moreover, I’ve Web2.0ified the counter and feed icon to make it more attractive
db
Vinay // Mar 30, 2007 at 3:18 am
I made it too almost 1700 in less than 4 months
its all about content
David Bradley // Mar 30, 2007 at 6:14 am
Good on ya!
Anonymous // May 24, 2007 at 7:49 am
Feedburner is being bought by Google
David Bradley // Jun 12, 2007 at 6:01 pm
Some great RSS tools, readers, plugins can be found here - http://mashable.com/2007/06/11/rss-toolbox/
David Bradley // Nov 2, 2007 at 7:53 am
The Feedburner subscriber count has, for me at least, been a very variable figure. On this site, the number fluctuates almost daily by ten percent up and down. On Sciencebase.com I see the subscribers rise and fall by several hundred over the course of the week. But this last seven days, it seems to have stabilized at around 2760 fluctuating by only one or two over the course of the last three days.
David Bradley // Dec 13, 2007 at 8:37 am
Over on JohnTP.com there is a debate underway about faking feedcount, this post will surely persuade you not to do that. Much more ethical is to display a different figure, such as an average daily visitor count and perhaps make that link to your feed, if visitors put two and two together and make five, so be it!
Leave a Comment