I Won’t Follow You on Twitter If…
July 28th, 2009 · by David Bradley >> 13 Comments
Switching to superioso mode, stepping up on to my soapbox and generally adopting an entirely faux intolerant stance, here’s some guidance for those unsure who to follow on Twitter.
Unless I know you from somewhere else, I won’t follow you on Twitter if:
You use an expletive in your bio
You have zero followers but are following several hundred others
You call yourself a maverick, a maven, a guru, a raconteur, or some other silly word
Your bio link leads to a spammy site
You have a lewd avatar
You claim to be a marketing, SEO, SEM expert
You tweet nothing but ads
You use the word leverage non-ironically
You only retweet and have no original tweets
You have protected your twitter updates
You tweet only in a language I don’t speak (sorry)
You are a boring bot
You are an advertiser for a dumb twitter tool
You are promoting a “get more followers on Twitter” scheme
You promote selling paid tweets
You produce a negative result at any point in my twitter algorithm
Sorry, but that’s just the way it is. In fact, I will not only not follow, I will actively block. Other users hoping to cut out the nonsense could do worse than following a similar approach. Any thoughts? Leave a comment, tweet me, or retweet with commentary.
http://search.twitter.com/search?q=follow+Twitter+sciencebase















13 responses so far ↓
David Bradley // Jul 28, 2009 at 8:02 am
I won’t follow you on Twitter if… http://sciencetext.com/64 Advice for control twitter freaks
Ari Herzog // Jul 28, 2009 at 8:06 am
Useful advice: I won’t follow you on Twitter if… http://sciencetext.com/64 Advice for control twitter freaks (via @sciencebase)
Joe Bonner // Jul 28, 2009 at 8:11 am
Good advice from @sciencebase I won’t follow you on Twitter if… http://sciencetext.com/64 Advice for control twitter freaks
KnightMare // Jul 28, 2009 at 9:06 am
Reading @sciencebase I Won’t Follow You on Twitter If… http://www.sciencetext.com/?p=2530
Ari Herzog // Jul 28, 2009 at 3:06 pm
I’m looking for a bullet that news sites like @CNN would apply, but I don’t see one.
David Bradley // Jul 28, 2009 at 3:28 pm
Not sure what you mean. I guess they’d fall into the category of generic corporate pseudobots…
David Bradley // Jul 28, 2009 at 3:36 pm
Of course, many of those “ifs” are very subjective one tweep’s lewd and crude is another’s fascination…
Kenna // Jul 28, 2009 at 4:09 pm
I think you have to include something like:
You don’t say anything interesting, important, novel, pithy etc. that I’d care to read. I.e. if you tweet about your selection at “Wendy’s” for lunch, I won’t bother with you.
Right now, at least, I think that’s part of the reason why I haven’t found my niche yet- still tweeting a mismash of stuff and only have something interesting for my “audience” about half the time. Until I find a “voice” and a message, I think that folks won’t follow me for awhile.
And they probably shouldn’t. I.e.- if you wouldn’t follow yourself, why would you expect someone else to.
David Bradley // Jul 28, 2009 at 4:18 pm
Interesting point Kenna. I think I somehow ended up falling into several niches, whether that was a good thing or not I don’t know. My follower to followee ratio isn’t too high, I don’t think. Maybe it’s time to purge and block as another tweeter alluded to.
Longest Drive // Jul 31, 2009 at 10:51 am
That’s a huge list you got there.
David Bradley // Jul 31, 2009 at 2:19 pm
Thanks!
JGold // Aug 1, 2009 at 8:00 am
David.. I think you would take back a few rules if you saw my uber Twitter money making machine . It is the best paid for tweet, work from home for 2 minutes a month way to get a million followers out!
But no really, great rules to tweet by..
Thanks
Mary Cottingham // Dec 25, 2009 at 4:46 pm
How about if I explicitly tell you not to bother, such as ” Sweepers only need apply as followers… everyone else will be BORED.”
Leave a Comment