Get More Comments on Your Blog得到更多的評論在您的博客
June 21st, 2007 · by David Bradley 2007年6月21日，大衛布拉德利
Regular readers will know all about Sciencetext’s Top Commentators Slot.定期的讀者都知道，所有關於sciencetext的頂端評論家插槽。 Comment on several posts and the link to which you assign your name in commenting will be promoted to the homepage, top right, assuming you have commented more than your fellow readers.評論的幾個職位和鏈接到你指定你的名字在評論將晉升為網頁，右上角，假設您的評論超過您的研究員以饗讀者。
This kind of promotion can boost overall comment numbers on any blog, and more comments as bloggers know, means more interaction with the readers, and that can only be a good thing.這種推廣可以增加整體評論的數目對任何博客，和更多的評論博客都知道，意味著更多的互動，與讀者，這只能是一件好事。 Dialog beats monologue any day.對話節拍的獨白任何一天。
But, there is a killer tip to get more comments on your blog that you will probably never see mentioned on the more mainstream tips and tricks sites, only here on Sciencetext will we reveal such a sneaky tweak.但是，有一個殺手提示，以獲得更多的評論在您的博客上說，你可能會再也看不到提到，更主流的技巧和竅門的網站，只有在這裡sciencetext將我們揭示了這樣一個鬼鬼祟祟的調整。
So, what is it?因此，它是什麼？
Well, that killer tip is to plant a deliberate error in your post.好，殺手秘訣是植物一種蓄意的錯誤在您的文章。 Something subtle, probably trivial, certainly not controversial.一些微妙的，可能是微不足道的，肯定不會引起爭議。 You will not believe how many pedants will come running to correct your slip, it is literally unbelievable.你不會相信有多少pedants會來運行，以糾正您的支路，這是從字面上令人難以置信的。
You can put together all kinds of cogent arguments, put forward a valid hypothesis in the clearest terms, but if you make a minor grammatical slip or do a unit conversion that’s out of kilter you will kickstart a comment flood.你可以把所有種有力的論據，提出了有效的假說，在清晰的條款，但是，如果你作輕微的語法支路或做一個單位轉換的失控狀態，你會kickstart評論防洪。 Having said that, of course, the problem with such a tip is that it could make you look stupid, even if you declare that the mistake was deliberate later in the comment thread, it could turn off some of your readers who may think you’re simply dumb to make such an obvious mistake.說了這麼多，當然，這個問題有這樣的提示是，它可以讓您看起來愚蠢的，即使你宣布這個錯誤是故意在稍後的評論線程，它可以關閉一些你的讀者誰可能會認為你』再簡單地啞作出這樣一個明顯的錯誤。 Of course, you could publish a post entitled “Get More Comments on Your Blog” as a kind of red herring to cover all mistakes in every subsequent post, but I still think most blog readers, being rather intelligent creatures, will see right through you?當然，您也可以發表後題為“得到更多的評論在您的博客上： ”作為一個種紅鯡魚，以涵蓋所有的錯誤，以後每職位，但我仍然認為大多數博客的讀者，而不是智能動物，將看到的權利，通過你？ Wot do you think? wot你覺得呢？
12 responses so far ↓ 12的反應，到目前為止↓
Hsien Lei 賢雷 // / / Jun 21, 2007 at 4:09 pm 2007年6月21日在下午4時09分
“most blog readers, being rather intelligent creatures” “最博客讀者，而不是智能動物”
You assume a lot!!你承擔了很多！
rob 白俄羅斯共和國 // / / Jun 21, 2007 at 5:59 pm 2007年6月21日在下午5時59分
Ha!房委會！ Yeah, one things for sure in this Internet world, pedants love an error.是啊，一個東西，肯定在這個互聯網世界， pedants愛一個錯誤。
Could get kinda tiring though , plus you might also get known as the blogger who keeps getting it wrong可以kinda雖然累，再加上您還可能獲得被稱為Blogger的誰不斷得到它是錯誤的
John Webber 約翰韋伯 // / / Jul 31, 2007 at 2:37 pm 2007年7月31日在下午2時37分
“Wot do you think?” “ wot你覺得呢？ ”
The correct spelling is “What”.正確的拼寫是“什麼” 。
David Bradley 大衛布拉德利 // / / Jul 31, 2007 at 5:56 pm 2007年7月31日在下午5時56分
Yep, John, I know. yep ，約翰，我知道。 I was attempting retro kitchy old-skool humor我是試圖復古kitchy舊skool幽默
John Webber 約翰韋伯 // / / Jul 31, 2007 at 6:47 pm 2007年7月31日在下午6時47分
Sorry David I was trying to make a joke對不起，大衛，我努力使一個笑話
David Bradley 大衛布拉德利 // / / Aug 1, 2007 at 8:00 am 2007年8月1日在上午08點
No problem John…maybe it’s ill-advised of me to make silly jokes like that as probably some readers will see it as lame or a faux attempt to appear more youthful while others may just I assume I cannot spel沒有問題的約翰…也許這是虐待告知我作出愚蠢的笑話一樣，大概是有些讀者會看到它作為跛腳或一faux企圖看起來更年輕，而其他可能只是我假設我不能規劃環境地政局局長
Svetoslav svetoslav // / / Aug 11, 2007 at 6:54 pm 2007年8月11日在下午6時54分
Hi,嗨，
everyone can make a grammatical error, but if you are showing a problem and its solution later on, and you have several mistakes people will feel lied and the respect towards you will decrease.每個人都可以作出的語法錯誤，但如果你是顯示的問題及其解決方法稍後，和你有幾個誤區的人會覺得說謊和尊重對你會減少。
by the way, please, fix the CSS problem because the page does not look very well and I write in 50px textarea which is not very good as well.由的方式，請修正的CSS問題，因為網頁不看非常好，我寫在50px文本，這是很好的作為。
Svetoslav svetoslav
David Bradley 大衛布拉德利 // / / Aug 20, 2007 at 1:20 pm 2007年8月20日在下午1時20分
Svetoslav, the idea was actually a joke. svetoslav ，構思其實是一個笑話。 I wouldn’t advise anyone to deliberately include mistakes in a post just to get comments.我會不會建議任何人，包括故意的失誤後剛剛獲得的評論。 What would be the point?會有什麼點？ To what CSS are you referring, by the way, the Sciencetext looks fine in all the browsers in which I tested it.什麼的CSS你所指的，由道路， sciencetext看來，罰款在所有的瀏覽器在我測試。 The comments box is certainly not just 50px across, if that’s what you mean.評論框當然不是剛才50px跨越，如果這是你的意思。 What browser do you use?瀏覽器是什麼，你用？
db分貝
Svetoslav svetoslav // / / Aug 20, 2007 at 1:29 pm 2007年8月20日在下午1時29分
I tried Firefox 2.0.0.6 did you try posting a comment as user ?我嘗試的Firefox 2.0.0.6你嘗試張貼評論用戶？
David Bradley 大衛布拉德利 // / / Aug 20, 2007 at 3:15 pm 2007年8月20日下午3時15分
Yep, just logged out and tested on 2.0.0.6 and it looks fine, do you want to email me a screengrab of the problem you’re facing? yep ，只是登出，並進行測試2.0.0.6和看來，罰款，你是否想以電子郵件寄給我一screengrab對您所遇到的問題所面臨的？ What resolution is your screen?是什麼決議，是您的屏幕呢？ What font size are you set to in the browser?什麼字體大小，你是否設置為在瀏覽器中？
Svetoslav svetoslav // / / Aug 20, 2007 at 4:13 pm 2007年8月20日在下午4時13分
By the way this was the last time I made a post.由的方式，這是我最後一次發了言。 At this moment it seems OK.在這一刻，似乎確定。
Cache stuff may be…快取記憶體的東西，可…
David Bradley 大衛布拉德利 // / / Aug 20, 2007 at 6:49 pm 2007年8月20日在下午6時49分
Svetoslav, it could’ve been a caching issue, the comment form worked perfectly for me on a test machine with that version of Firefox and indeed all the other browsers I tried. svetoslav ，它可以一直在一個緩存的問題，評論的形式工作，完全可以為我上一試驗機與版本的Firefox事實上，所有其他的瀏覽器我嘗試。 Perhaps you hit a blip and it didn’t fully call the CSS for whatever reason before you started typing…we’ll probably never know.也許你擊中位置亮點，並沒有充分調用的CSS ，不論基於何種原因之前，你開始打字… …我們將可能永遠都不會知道。
Leave a Comment留下意見