Get More Comments on Your Blog得到更多的评论在您的博客
June 21st, 2007 · by David Bradley 2007年6月21日，大卫布拉德利
Regular readers will know all about Sciencetext’s Top Commentators Slot.定期的读者都知道，所有关于sciencetext的顶端评论家插槽。 Comment on several posts and the link to which you assign your name in commenting will be promoted to the homepage, top right, assuming you have commented more than your fellow readers.评论的几个职位和链接到你指定你的名字在评论将晋升为网页，右上角，假设您的评论超过您的研究员以飨读者。
This kind of promotion can boost overall comment numbers on any blog, and more comments as bloggers know, means more interaction with the readers, and that can only be a good thing.这种推广可以增加整体评论的数目对任何博客，和更多的评论博客都知道，意味着更多的互动，与读者，这只能是一件好事。 Dialog beats monologue any day.对话节拍的独白任何一天。
But, there is a killer tip to get more comments on your blog that you will probably never see mentioned on the more mainstream tips and tricks sites, only here on Sciencetext will we reveal such a sneaky tweak.但是，有一个杀手提示，以获得更多的评论在您的博客上说，你可能会再也看不到提到，更主流的技巧和窍门的网站，只有在这里sciencetext将我们揭示了这样一个鬼鬼祟祟的调整。
So, what is it?因此，它是什么？
Well, that killer tip is to plant a deliberate error in your post.好，杀手秘诀是植物一种蓄意的错误在您的文章。 Something subtle, probably trivial, certainly not controversial.一些微妙的，可能是微不足道的，肯定不会引起争议。 You will not believe how many pedants will come running to correct your slip, it is literally unbelievable.你不会相信有多少pedants会来运行，以纠正您的支路，这是从字面上令人难以置信的。
You can put together all kinds of cogent arguments, put forward a valid hypothesis in the clearest terms, but if you make a minor grammatical slip or do a unit conversion that’s out of kilter you will kickstart a comment flood.你可以把所有种有力的论据，提出了有效的假说，在清晰的条款，但是，如果你作轻微的语法支路或做一个单位转换的失控状态，你会kickstart评论防洪。 Having said that, of course, the problem with such a tip is that it could make you look stupid, even if you declare that the mistake was deliberate later in the comment thread, it could turn off some of your readers who may think you’re simply dumb to make such an obvious mistake.说了这么多，当然，这个问题有这样的提示是，它可以让您看起来愚蠢的，即使你宣布这个错误是故意在稍后的评论线程，它可以关闭一些你的读者谁可能会认为你』再简单地哑作出这样一个明显的错误。 Of course, you could publish a post entitled “Get More Comments on Your Blog” as a kind of red herring to cover all mistakes in every subsequent post, but I still think most blog readers, being rather intelligent creatures, will see right through you?当然，您也可以发表后题为“得到更多的评论在您的博客上： ”作为一个种红鲱鱼，以涵盖所有的错误，以后每职位，但我仍然认为大多数博客的读者，而不是智能动物，将看到的权利，通过你？ Wot do you think? wot你觉得呢？
12 responses so far ↓ 12的反应，到目前为止↓
Hsien Lei 贤雷 // / / Jun 21, 2007 at 4:09 pm 2007年6月21日在下午4时09分
“most blog readers, being rather intelligent creatures” “最博客读者，而不是智能动物”
You assume a lot!!你承担了很多！
rob 白俄罗斯共和国 // / / Jun 21, 2007 at 5:59 pm 2007年6月21日在下午5时59分
Ha!房委会！ Yeah, one things for sure in this Internet world, pedants love an error.是啊，一个东西，肯定在这个互联网世界， pedants爱一个错误。
Could get kinda tiring though , plus you might also get known as the blogger who keeps getting it wrong可以kinda虽然累，再加上您还可能获得被称为Blogger的谁不断得到它是错误的
John Webber 约翰韦伯 // / / Jul 31, 2007 at 2:37 pm 2007年7月31日在下午2时37分
“Wot do you think?” “ wot你觉得呢？ ”
The correct spelling is “What”.正确的拼写是“什么” 。
David Bradley 大卫布拉德利 // / / Jul 31, 2007 at 5:56 pm 2007年7月31日在下午5时56分
Yep, John, I know. yep ，约翰，我知道。 I was attempting retro kitchy old-skool humor我是试图复古kitchy旧skool幽默
John Webber 约翰韦伯 // / / Jul 31, 2007 at 6:47 pm 2007年7月31日在下午6时47分
Sorry David I was trying to make a joke对不起，大卫，我努力使一个笑话
David Bradley 大卫布拉德利 // / / Aug 1, 2007 at 8:00 am 2007年8月1日在上午08点
No problem John…maybe it’s ill-advised of me to make silly jokes like that as probably some readers will see it as lame or a faux attempt to appear more youthful while others may just I assume I cannot spel没有问题的约翰…也许这是虐待告知我作出愚蠢的笑话一样，大概是有些读者会看到它作为跛脚或一faux企图看起来更年轻，而其他可能只是我假设我不能规划环境地政局局长
Svetoslav svetoslav // / / Aug 11, 2007 at 6:54 pm 2007年8月11日在下午6时54分
Hi,嗨，
everyone can make a grammatical error, but if you are showing a problem and its solution later on, and you have several mistakes people will feel lied and the respect towards you will decrease.每个人都可以作出的语法错误，但如果你是显示的问题及其解决方法稍后，和你有几个误区的人会觉得说谎和尊重对你会减少。
by the way, please, fix the CSS problem because the page does not look very well and I write in 50px textarea which is not very good as well.由的方式，请修正的CSS问题，因为网页不看非常好，我写在50px文本，这是很好的作为。
Svetoslav svetoslav
David Bradley 大卫布拉德利 // / / Aug 20, 2007 at 1:20 pm 2007年8月20日在下午1时20分
Svetoslav, the idea was actually a joke. svetoslav ，构思其实是一个笑话。 I wouldn’t advise anyone to deliberately include mistakes in a post just to get comments.我会不会建议任何人，包括故意的失误后刚刚获得的评论。 What would be the point?会有什么点？ To what CSS are you referring, by the way, the Sciencetext looks fine in all the browsers in which I tested it.什么的CSS你所指的，由道路， sciencetext看来，罚款在所有的浏览器在我测试。 The comments box is certainly not just 50px across, if that’s what you mean.评论框当然不是刚才50px跨越，如果这是你的意思。 What browser do you use?浏览器是什么，你用？
db分贝
Svetoslav svetoslav // / / Aug 20, 2007 at 1:29 pm 2007年8月20日在下午1时29分
I tried Firefox 2.0.0.6 did you try posting a comment as user ?我尝试的Firefox 2.0.0.6你尝试张贴评论用户？
David Bradley 大卫布拉德利 // / / Aug 20, 2007 at 3:15 pm 2007年8月20日下午3时15分
Yep, just logged out and tested on 2.0.0.6 and it looks fine, do you want to email me a screengrab of the problem you’re facing? yep ，只是登出，并进行测试2.0.0.6和看来，罚款，你是否想以电子邮件寄给我一screengrab对您所遇到的问题所面临的？ What resolution is your screen?是什么决议，是您的屏幕呢？ What font size are you set to in the browser?什么字体大小，你是否设置为在浏览器中？
Svetoslav svetoslav // / / Aug 20, 2007 at 4:13 pm 2007年8月20日在下午4时13分
By the way this was the last time I made a post.由的方式，这是我最后一次发了言。 At this moment it seems OK.在这一刻，似乎确定。
Cache stuff may be…快取记忆体的东西，可…
David Bradley 大卫布拉德利 // / / Aug 20, 2007 at 6:49 pm 2007年8月20日在下午6时49分
Svetoslav, it could’ve been a caching issue, the comment form worked perfectly for me on a test machine with that version of Firefox and indeed all the other browsers I tried. svetoslav ，它可以一直在一个缓存的问题，评论的形式工作，完全可以为我上一试验机与版本的Firefox事实上，所有其他的浏览器我尝试。 Perhaps you hit a blip and it didn’t fully call the CSS for whatever reason before you started typing…we’ll probably never know.也许你击中位置亮点，并没有充分调用的CSS ，不论基于何种原因之前，你开始打字… …我们将可能永远都不会知道。
Leave a Comment留下意见