Five Twitter Do's and Five Twitter Don'ts五Twitter的做的，五Twitter的注意事項
May 14th, 2009 · by David Bradley >> 2009年5月14日·由大衛布拉德利“” 8 Comments 8評論
If you're only a follower on Twitter, keeping up with the news, celebs, or interesting tweeps, then ignore this, it really won't apply to you.如果你只是一個跟隨的Twitter，跟上新聞，名人，或有趣tweeps，然後忽略這一點，真的要對您不適用。 But, if you use Twitter because you want to engage with other people, you still want to read the watercooler chat of celebs, everyday people and keep up with the news, but you also want to interact, then listen up:但是，如果您使用Twitter的，因為你要與其他人接觸，你還是要讀水冷卻器名人聊天，每天人跟上消息，但是你也想互動，然後聽取了：
Five twitter do's and five twitter don'ts五嘰嘰喳喳做什麼和5嘰嘰喳喳注意事項
Do's 做的
- Do make sure you have an interesting bio一定要確保你有一個有趣的生物
- Do provide a link to your blog, site, or extended profile是否提供了一個鏈接到你的博客，網站或擴展文件
- Do change the default avatar once and once only.不要更改默認的頭像一次，一次。
- Do reply to genuine direct messages是否真正直接答复郵件
- Do follow people back if they interest you是否遵循以人回來，如果他們感興趣
Don'ts 注意事項
- Don't follow hundreds of new people in one go不要按照新的數百人一次過
- Don't retweet (RT) without giving credit to the original tweep不要retweet（往返）沒有給予信貸原來tweep
- Don't follow me if you are following more than 500 tweeps but have zero followers yourself不要跟著我，如果你是以下超過500 tweeps但有自己的追隨者為零
- Don't RT trending news, unless you have something to add不要逆轉錄趨勢的消息，除非你有什麼補充
- Don't ignore a genuine direct message (DM)不要忽視真正的直接的信息（馬克）
If you've taken those on board (and why shouldn't you?) feel free to join me on如果您所採取的上（為什麼不應該嗎？）隨時加入我的 twitter嘰嘰喳喳 where I am我在哪裡 @sciencebase @ sciencebase . 。
8 responses so far ↓ 8答复迄今↓
sufficiency 自給自足 // May 14, 2009 at 2:09 pm / / 2009年5月14日在下午2時09
I've gotten a number of what look like automated DMs thanking me when I follow someone/thing.我已經得到一個數字是什麼樣子的自動模式草案感謝我當我追踪人/事。 Haven't bothered to reply to those!沒有費心去答复這些！
David Bradley 大衛布拉德利 // May 14, 2009 at 2:21 pm / / 2009年5月14日在下午2點21分
I actually encapsulated these thoughts in a其實，我這些想法封裝在 twitter decision flowchart嘰嘰喳喳的決定流程圖 earlier.較早。
David Bradley 大衛布拉德利 // May 14, 2009 at 2:25 pm / / 2009年5月14日在下午2點25分
Oh,哦， @arruniel suggests @ arruniel建議 keeping tweets at less than 120 characters to allow others to retweet it easily.保持鳴叫低於120個字符，讓別人retweet很容易。
David Bradley 大衛布拉德利 // May 14, 2009 at 2:29 pm / / 2009年5月14日在下午2時29分
That's fair enough, they usually stand out as automated.這是公平的，他們通常會站出來的自動化。 Carry on ignoring those.繼續無視這些。
Ari Herzog 阿里赫爾佐格 // May 16, 2009 at 2:13 am / / 09年5月16日在上午02點13分
I partially agree and partially disagree, David.餘部分同意，部分不同意，大衛。 For starters…對於初學者...
1. 1。 An interesting bio to one is uninteresting to another.一個有趣的生物，是一個無趣到另一個。 If your mother could understand and/or like it, keep it.如果你的母親能夠理解和/或喜歡它，就繼續。
2. 2。 There is nothing wrong with changing avatars.沒有什麼錯不斷變化的化身。 What if you get a new haircut?如果你得到一個新的髮型？ What if you change your account from a personal one to a brand or vice versa?如果您更改您的帳戶從一個個人品牌，反之亦然？
3. 3。 If you don't reply to a DM, someone will @ you.如果你不答复馬克，有人會@你。 If you don't receive the @, the DM was probably not genuine in want of a response.如果您沒有收到@，德國馬克的可能不是真正的希望的反應。
David Bradley 大衛布拉德利 // May 16, 2009 at 8:28 am / / 09年5月16日在上午08點28分
@Ari thanks for your thoughts, useful as always. @阿里感謝你的想法，總是有用的。 I reply: (1) Yeah, bios are subjective, which is why I used the word “interesting” who's to say what that is, eh?我的回答：（1）是的，BIOS的是主觀的，這就是為什麼我用“有趣”誰是說那是什麼，不是嗎？ Best to have something that you think is “interesting” as opposed to nothing at all.最好有一些你認為是“有趣”，而不是什麼也沒有。 (2) No, you're right, there's nothing wrong with changing avatars, if you're fairly well established, but I think they're a powerful branding tool and if you choose one it's best to stick with it, at least until you have a decent following across social media. （2）不，你是對的，沒有什麼錯不斷變化的化身，如果你比較完備，但我認為他們是一支強大的品牌工具，如果你選擇一個最好堅持採用這種方法，至少要到你有一個像樣以下整個社會性媒體。 (3) That's an interesting point. （3）這是一個有趣的觀點。 If someone really needs to tell you something, they'll find a way, if they don't bother, then you can ask was it worth their trying to say in in the first place.如果有人真的需要告訴你一些事情，他們會找到一種方式，如果他們不介意，那麼你就可以問的是這值得他們要說出的首先。
Eydie Stumpf Eydie斯頓夫 // May 16, 2009 at 8:39 pm / / 09年5月16日在下午8點39分
I tend to agree with Ari regarding the avatar.我傾向於同意阿里就化身。
Recently I changed my profile photo because the photo I was using was about 4 years old.最近，我改變了我的個人資料照片，因為這張照片我用大約4歲。 An update was needed because I wanted to portray the way I look NOW.更新是必要的，因為我想描繪的方式我期待了。 If only we could hold back the hands of time it might not be an issue!如果我們能阻擋手中的時間可能不是一個問題！
We need to be flexible and remember that there are always exceptions to the rules.我們需要靈活，記得總有例外的規則。
I'd like to add 2 more “don'ts”.我想更多的加2“不”。
1. 1。 Don't post 20 updates at one time and hog up my Twitter screen!請勿張貼20更新一次和豬了我的Twitter的屏幕！
2. 2。 If you only post quotes, how the heck will I get to know you?如果你只報價後，如何赫克我將了解你？
David Bradley 大衛布拉德利 // May 17, 2009 at 11:45 am / / 09年5月17日在上午11時45分
Eydie, okay, I'm hoist by my own petard. Eydie，好吧，我吊我自己的花火。 My avatar is actually getting old and I guess I'm going to have to change it soon.我的頭像實際上是老了，我想我將不得不改變它很快。 I actually wrote about how to achieve this kind of其實，我寫了如何實現這一目標種 virtual blogging immortality虛擬博客不朽 a while back.一會兒回來。
Leave a Comment發表評論