Feedburner Feedcount Feedburner的Feedcount
November 6th, 2009 · by David Bradley >> 2009年11月6日·由大衛布拉德利“” Leave a comment發表評論
When did you last check your blog's subscriber numbers?你什麼時候最後一次檢查您的博客的用戶數量? It's been quite a while for me.這是相當一段時間我。 But, this week, I decided to take a quick look at my但是,這個星期,我決定採取快看我的 Feedburner stats Feedburner的統計 . 。 Seems that看來 Sciencetext Sciencetext , , SciScoop SciScoop , and和 Sciencebase Sciencebase are all doing rather well.都做得相當好。 In fact, the former two are doing a lot better than expected…事實上,前兩個是做了很多好於預期...
…which was worrying. ...這是令人擔憂。 Visitor rates had not changed much.遊客比例並沒有多大變化。 Traffic has gradually climbed over the last few months and individual posts occasionally get retweeted or bookmarked on various social media sites.交通已逐漸攀升,在過去數月個別的帖子偶爾會retweeted或書籤的各種社會媒體網站。 However, the leap for Sciencetext specifically since the last time I checked was enormous – a doubling, in fact.然而,飛躍的Sciencetext,尤其是自我最後一次檢查是巨大的-增加一倍,在事實。 Was this simply another example of the這僅僅是一個例子, Feedburner feedcount myth Feedburner的feedcount神話 , yet another example of Google's shoddy handling of the system since it took over or something else? ,再次證明了谷歌的劣質處理系統,因為它接管了還是其他什麼東西?
Well, it appears that Feedburner now takes嗯,現在看來,Feedburner的需要 FriendFeed的FriendFeed subscribers into account when totting up your subscriber numbers.用戶totting時,會考慮你的用戶數量。 Now, so Sciencetext, SciScoop, and Sciencebase all seem to benefiting from subscribers who follow me as “sciencebase” on FriendFeed.現在,這樣Sciencetext,SciScoop和Sciencebase似乎都得益於訂戶誰跟我來為“sciencebase”上的FriendFeed。 But, those are all the same subscribers, so if I were to add up the individuals following all three blogs, would I simple have a massively overlapped Venn diagram?但是,這些都是一樣的用戶,所以如果我要添加了以下三個個人博客,我會簡單的有大量重疊的維恩圖? I suspect so…rather disheartening, really.我懷疑這樣...令人十分沮喪,真的。 I wish I'd never looked.我希望我從來沒有期待。















0 responses so far ↓ 0答复迄今↓
Please leave a comment (sets an antispam cookie)請發表評論(套一個反垃圾郵件的Cookie)
Leave a Comment發表評論