Feedburner Feedcount Feedburner的Feedcount

When did you last check your blog's subscriber numbers?你什么时候最后一次检查您的博客的用户数量？ It's been quite a while for me.这是相当一段时间我。 But, this week, I decided to take a quick look at my但是，这个星期，我决定采取快看我的 Feedburner stats Feedburner的统计 . 。 Seems that看来 Sciencetext Sciencetext , ， SciScoop SciScoop , and和 Sciencebase Sciencebase are all doing rather well.都做得相当好。 In fact, the former two are doing a lot better than expected…事实上，前两个是做了很多好于预期...

…which was worrying. ...这是令人担忧。 Visitor rates had not changed much.游客比例并没有多大变化。 Traffic has gradually climbed over the last few months and individual posts occasionally get retweeted or bookmarked on various social media sites.交通已逐渐攀升，在过去数月个别的帖子偶尔会retweeted或各种社会媒体网站书签。 However, the leap for Sciencetext specifically since the last time I checked was enormous – a doubling, in fact.然而，Sciencetext，尤其是自我最后一次检查是巨大的飞跃-增加一倍，在事实。 Was this simply another example of the在这个根本另一个例子 Feedburner feedcount myth Feedburner的feedcount神话 , yet another example of Google's shoddy handling of the system since it took over or something else? ，再次证明了谷歌的系统伪劣的处理，因为它还是其他什么东西多了？

Well, it appears that Feedburner now takes嗯，现在看来，Feedburner的需要 FriendFeed的FriendFeed subscribers into account when totting up your subscriber numbers.考虑到用户时totting你的用户数量。 Now, so Sciencetext, SciScoop, and Sciencebase all seem to benefiting from subscribers who follow me as “sciencebase” on FriendFeed.现在，这样Sciencetext，SciScoop和Sciencebase似乎都得益于订户谁遵循“sciencebase上的FriendFeed我。” But, those are all the same subscribers, so if I were to add up the individuals following all three blogs, would I simple have a massively overlapped Venn diagram?但是，这些都是一样的用户，所以如果我要添加了以下三个个人博客，我会简单的有大量重叠的维恩图？ I suspect so…rather disheartening, really.我怀疑这样...令人十分沮丧，真的。 I wish I'd never looked.我希望我从来没有期待。