http://www.sciencetext.com/dynamic-quality-control-for-the-web.html Sciencetext Tech Talk, PC tips, blog hacks, browsing, blogging, social media Sat, 24 Jul 2010 18:18:17 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 http://www.sciencetext.com/dynamic-quality-control-for-the-web.html/comment-page-1#comment-137734 Hersh Bhardwaj Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:48:44 +0000 http://www.sciencetext.com/?p=2237#comment-137734 Exactly! I am glad you thought the same. Its easy to theorize and list problems; as we do in most university research departments!(sorry to sound anti-academic). Exactly! I am glad you thought the same. Its easy to theorize and list problems; as we do in most university research departments!(sorry to sound anti-academic).

]]> http://www.sciencetext.com/dynamic-quality-control-for-the-web.html/comment-page-1#comment-137699 David Bradley Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:56:20 +0000 http://www.sciencetext.com/?p=2237#comment-137699 Yeah, I think you're probably right. I reported on this because I thought it was an interesting paper, but I don't feel they actually have an answer. Yeah, I think you’re probably right. I reported on this because I thought it was an interesting paper, but I don’t feel they actually have an answer.

]]> http://www.sciencetext.com/dynamic-quality-control-for-the-web.html/comment-page-1#comment-137658 Hersh Bhardwaj Tue, 24 Feb 2009 12:45:00 +0000 http://www.sciencetext.com/?p=2237#comment-137658 Hi David, Insightful post, thanks. I have read prof. Yadav's writings in past. Everyone from a Matt Cutts to an ordinary searcher has always wondered if such a system can be developed where we get the most relevant information every time. Theoretically, a dynamic and flexible system can be developed but again websites are not designed upon an absolute standard in science labs. Even the most perfect system will have problems rating the same ten sites in the same ranking every time. Its not the spammers we should worry about, its the basic relevancy-issues of SEs that first need a lot of attention. What you think? Hi David,
Insightful post, thanks. I have read prof. Yadav’s writings in past. Everyone from a Matt Cutts to an ordinary searcher has always wondered if such a system can be developed where we get the most relevant information every time. Theoretically, a dynamic and flexible system can be developed but again websites are not designed upon an absolute standard in science labs. Even the most perfect system will have problems rating the same ten sites in the same ranking every time. Its not the spammers we should worry about, its the basic relevancy-issues of SEs that first need a lot of attention. What you think?

]]>