傾銷Blogroll
2007年7月11日 · 由大衛布雷得里
韋恩Smallman在 技術新聞站點BlahBlahTech 傾銷了他的blogroll這個星期。 他有幾個非常充足的理由，不最少是缺乏上下文為外在站點手段的所有那些鏈接blogroll有它的天和不再提供服務給讀者。 感到羞恥，他告訴我另一方面他打算增加Sciencetext，但改變了主意。
無論如何，有另一個非常充足的理由傾銷您的blogroll，或者至少檢查鏈接根據一個相當規則依據并且確定他們指向合法的站點-壞領域。
我意味什麼壞領域？ 您未曾給一個鏈接站點，无需檢查它，我聽見您哭泣! 很好，怎麼樣您增加三年前的那個站點？ 有用的內容巨大小的blog…裝載…實際上ads…不為您的blogroll完善。
很好，領域由增加指向所有她的賭博娛樂場會員站點的一個巨型的目錄的鏈接農廠splogger到期了和收買。
您與那個領域現在連接! 并且Google不喜歡與其他站點連接的站點，如那，它在您非常反射，并且他們準備正義的通過投下它處罰您的站點。
當然，這是一個最壞的情景，但我看見一些偉大的站點在過去十年來來往往和一半和有些結束了由違法Rx站點、賭博娛樂場圓環和pr0n站點被接管。 它確定地不是一個好主意連接到他們。
如此，而您不可以準備放棄您的整體blogroll為這種小風險，時常檢查在那些鏈接，在根本名列前茅十可能平衡修剪名單下來，因此您能更加有效地處理他們。 就是不要被逮住與您的blogroll在是全部的賭博娛樂場中。
Add me on StumbleUpon
Join me on Facebook
Browse my Flickr Photos
Follow my Tumblr Page
Check out my Pownce Profile
Follow my Twitters
Network with me on LinkedIn
Shout me on Digg
到目前為止9個反應↓
robwatts // 2007年7月11日在4:59 pm
我會保留blog捲，對頭版或nofollow只制約他們他們在內部頁。
您說，如果您適當地處理您的blog，您應該捉住變質的奇怪的站點。
我可以想像一個更加巨大的困難，你必須處理多blogs，總之我說blog捲是一件好事，特別是當開始時。
大衛布雷得里 // 2007年7月11日在5:03 pm
Yes, Rob, you’re right, of course, it would be far too rash to ditch blogrolls altogether, but there is a serious side to just idling along and adding links on an ad hoc basis without checking back from time to time. Now, if there were some way to scan one’s links automatically and check that they don’t point to banned or dangerous sites that would be rather useful. Anyone got a plugin that does that?
robwatts // Jul 11, 2007 at 5:10 pm
Well, php has all manner of networking functions.
Im sure that something could be written that used Curl.
You could use a cronjob to periodically read the homepages of sites in your blogroll, and compare the text against a list of stopwords in say a db or textfile somewhere…
I might just code it if I find the time
David Bradley // Jul 11, 2007 at 5:19 pm
That would be ab fab…come back and let us know when you do, it will get pride of place on this site.
jeremy // Jul 12, 2007 at 3:51 pm
Hmmm, I didn’t even think that my blogroll could have such an adverse effect. Good thing I’m really anal about who I link to.
What if you link to a blog in your posts, and the blog goes under? Does that have the same adverse effect? if so, I’ve got a buttload of links there that could be a huge pain in the arse.
David Bradley // Jul 12, 2007 at 5:07 pm
Jeremy, I don’t think it will in general have a very seriously adverse effect, although a friend of mine who had a chemistry site many years ago, let the domain lapse and it was quickly commandeered by pornographers, left lots of chemistry directories pointing to a rather tasteless domain until word got around.
jeremy // Jul 12, 2007 at 6:09 pm
phew, ok. Still a good reason to keep my site as quality as I can make it, and maybe build a fort around it.
David Bradley // Jul 12, 2007 at 9:03 pm
Jeremy, that’s always a good strategy for any blog: First, make it as good as you can, secondly, make it secure and protect it from dodgy sites, link farms, and spam.
Hsien Lei // Jul 20, 2007 at 12:40 pm
The most annoying thing I find about blogrolls is when they get too long and unwieldy for display. I get around that by showing a random selection of 10 on each pageload.
Leave a Comment