Does Your Feedburner Count Bounce請問您的Feedburner計數彈跳
January 16th, 2007 · by David Bradley >> 07年1月16日·由大衛布拉德利“” 1 Comment 1條評論
Does your Feedburner count seem to bounce up and down on a daily basis.你的Feedburner的罪名似乎反彈向上和向下每天。 Monday's it's fairly good, better on Tuesday, but then a big drop by the end of the week, and a precipitous fall at weekends?週一是相當不錯的,更好的星期二,但隨後大幅下滑的結束一周,並在週末急劇下降? Is it because old subscribers unsubscribe at regular intervals or is it just natural fluctuations due to the actual activity of the countless feed readers out there?是不是因為老訂戶退訂,定期或只是自然的波動,由於實際活動的無數供稿閱讀器在那裡?
I thought I'd do a quick analysis of some of my feeds to see if I could spot a pattern.我想我會做一個快速分析我的一些資訊,看看我能當場模式。 As I said the feedcount fluctuates quite widely over the course of the week, but any day-to-day downward fluctuations across all my blog feeds are never more than 5% unless there's a big outage at Google Reader or another site and in general the trend is upwards.正如我所說的feedcount相當廣泛的波動在本週過程,但任何一天進行日常向下波動我所有博客供稿不超過5%,除非有一個大的故障在谷歌讀者或其他網站和一般的趨勢是向上。 If you think about it, there might be a large proportion of your subscribers who grab your feed from work or school but don't log into those accounts at weekends.如果你想一想,可能有很大比例的用戶誰抓住你的飼料上班或上學,但沒有這些帳戶登錄到週末。 Conversely, there are some people who will only check feeds at weekend when they're not working.相反,有些人誰只會檢查飼料在週末他們不工作。
Of course, if you've only got 100 feed subscribers, a drop of five may seem like quite a few of your virtual buddies took umbrage and signed off.當然,如果你只得到100飼料用戶,一下降了5看起來不少您的虛擬好友感到不悅,並簽署了關閉。 Such a drop might trigger you to frantically rearrange stuff on your blog and maybe change direction for today's post.這種下降可能引發瘋狂地重新排列你的東西在你的博客,也許改變方向今天的職位。 But, hold off doing anything too radical on that basis, next day you may be up to 107.但是,暫時不要做任何過激在此基礎上,第二天,你可能會達到107。 So, did you get 12 new readers, or did the missing 5 simply show up in Feedburner's stats and you gained 7 genuinely new readers?所以,你得到12個新的讀者,還是失踪的5只出現在FeedBurner的統計,你獲得了7真正新的讀者?
I think the latter is far more plausible, especially when I consider the feedcount for Sciencebase.我認為後者更為可信,特別是當我認為feedcount的Sciencebase。 Sciencebase has almost 3000 subscribers (2908 at a peak last week) but I see the same percentage drops over the course of the week, which are then back to previous values by the following Tuesday. Sciencebase有近3000用戶(2908年到達了頂峰,最後一個星期),但我看到相同的百分比在下降過程中,一周,然後再回到以前的值由下週二。 I doubt very much I'm suddenly losing and gaining so many different people at a turn.我很懷疑我突然失去和獲得這麼多不同的人在轉。 It really has to be simple analytics fluctuations at Feedburner.這的確是簡單的分析在Feedburner的波動。
So, the bottom line is: if you're looking at your feed count over the course of a month say, and seeing a slight climb, then you're doing well, even if there are peaks and troughs in between.因此,底線是:如果你看你的飼料數到這一過程中,1月說,他看到一個小幅增加,那麼你做得很好,即使有高峰和低谷之間。 In other words, it looks worse than it is when you see a drop.換句話說,它看起來不如它是當你看到一個下降。 And, of course when it's a climb from an average then that really is new people subscribing.而且,當然,當它是一個由平均上升當時真的是新的認購人。 So, as I've said before in a different context –因此,正如我以前說過的,在不同的環境- Don't Panic不要驚慌 . 。
















1 response so far ↓ 1反應迄今↓
David Bradley 大衛布拉德利 // Apr 28, 2008 at 11:19 am / / 2008年4月28日在上午11時19分
netvibes updated itself last week and stopped reporting subscriber numbers to Feedburner. Netvibes的自行更新上週報告,並停止向Feedburner的用戶數量。 Consequently, lots of sites with many subscribers from that system have seen a big drop in their totals, including Sciencebase.com which is down from well over 3000 to closer to 2200 or thereabouts.因此,大量的地盤,許多用戶從該系統已經出現了大幅度下降,在他們的總數,包括Sciencebase.com是下降超過3000至接近2200年前後。 Hopefully, they will rectify things soon.希望,他們會很快糾正的事情。
db分貝
Leave a Comment發表評論