Does Your Feedburner Count Bounce請問貴feedburner跳出計數
January 16th, 2007 · by David Bradley 2007年1月16日,大衛布拉德利
Does your Feedburner count seem to bounce up and down on a daily basis.請問你feedburner計數似乎反彈向上和向下對每日的基礎。 Monday’s it’s fairly good, better on Tuesday, but then a big drop by the end of the week, and a precipitous fall at weekends?週一的,它的相當不錯,更好地對週二,但隨後大幅下降,由去年底的一周內,和倉促秋天在週末呢? Is it because old subscribers unsubscribe at regular intervals or is it just natural fluctuations due to the actual activity of the countless feed readers out there?是不是因為老訂戶退訂,定期或是否只是自然的波動,由於實際活動的無數飼料讀者有?
I thought I’d do a quick analysis of some of my feeds to see if I could spot a pattern.我以為我想要做一個快速分析我的一些飼料地看到,如果我能現貨的格局。 As I said the feedcount fluctuates quite widely over the course of the week, but any day-to-day downward fluctuations across all my blog feeds are never more than 5% unless there’sa big outage at Google Reader or another site and in general the trend is upwards.正如我所說, feedcount波動相當普遍超過的過程中的一周內,但任何日常向下波動,所有我的博客供稿從來都不是5 %以上,除非有大停電,在Google閱讀器或另一個網站,並在總體趨勢是向上。 If you think about it, there might be a large proportion of your subscribers who grab your feed from work or school but don’t log into those accounts at weekends.如果你想想看,有可能是一個較大的比例您的訂閱誰拿起你的飼料,從工作或上學,但不登錄到這些賬戶在週末。 Conversely, there are some people who will only check feeds at weekend when they’re not working.反過來說,有一些人誰只會檢查飼料在週末時,他們沒有工作。
Of course, if you’ve only got 100 feed subscribers, a drop of five may seem like quite a few of your virtual buddies took umbrage and signed off.當然,如果您只得到100飼料訂戶,下降了5五月好像有不少您的虛擬朋友了umbrage ,並簽署了小康。 Such a drop might trigger you to frantically rearrange stuff on your blog and maybe change direction for today’s post.這種下降,可能會引發你瘋狂地重新排列的東西在你的博客上,也許改變方向,為今天的職位。 But, hold off doing anything too radical on that basis, next day you may be up to 107.但是,暫緩做任何過於激進在此基礎上,第二天,您可高達107 。 So, did you get 12 new readers, or did the missing 5 simply show up in Feedburner’s stats and you gained 7 genuinely new readers?所以,你得到12個新讀者,還是沒有失踪5簡單顯示在feedburner的統計信息和您取得七真正的新讀者?
I think the latter is far more plausible, especially when I consider the feedcount for Sciencebase.我認為後者是更為可行的,尤其是當我考慮feedcount為sciencebase 。 Sciencebase has almost 3000 subscribers (2908 at a peak last week) but I see the same percentage drops over the course of the week, which are then back to previous values by the following Tuesday. sciencebase已差不多3000用戶( 2908年在山頂上週) ,但我看到相同的百分比下降,超過的過程中的一周內,然後再回到原先的值由下列星期二。 I doubt very much I’m suddenly losing and gaining so many different people at a turn.我很懷疑我突然失去和獲得這麼多不同的人在一轉。 It really has to be simple analytics fluctuations at Feedburner.是否真的要簡單的分析波動在feedburner 。
So, the bottom line is: if you’re looking at your feed count over the course of a month say, and seeing a slight climb, then you’re doing well, even if there are peaks and troughs in between.因此,底線是:如果您正在尋找您的飼料計數超過的過程中,每月說,看到有輕微上升,那麼,您做好,即使有高峰和低谷之間的。 In other words, it looks worse than it is when you see a drop.在其他換句話說,它看上去那麼糟糕,這是當你看到下降。 And, of course when it’sa climb from an average then that really is new people subscribing. ,當然,當它爬從一平均,然後真的是一個新的人訂閱。 So, as I’ve said before in a different context -因此,正如我已經說過,在一個不同的背景- Don’t Panic不要驚慌 . 。


















1 response so far ↓ 1回應到目前為止↓
David Bradley 大衛布拉德利 // / / Apr 28, 2008 at 11:19 am 2008年4月28日在上午11時19分
netvibes updated itself last week and stopped reporting subscriber numbers to Feedburner. netvibes自行更新上星期,並停止申報登記編號,以feedburner 。 Consequently, lots of sites with many subscribers from that system have seen a big drop in their totals, including Sciencebase.com which is down from well over 3000 to closer to 2200 or thereabouts.因此,大量的地盤,很多用戶都從這個系統出現了大幅度下降,在他們的總數,包括sciencebase.com這是從遠遠超過3000到2200年接近或thereabouts 。 Hopefully, they will rectify things soon.我們希望,他們會盡快糾正的事情。
db分貝
Leave a Comment留下意見