Sciencetext提示和技巧

Tech talk, social media, computing tips and tricks 技术讲座,社会媒体,计算技巧和窍门



Does Your Feedburner Count Bounce请问您的Feedburner计数弹跳

January 16th, 2007 · by David Bradley >> 07年1月16日·由大卫布拉德利“” 1 Comment 1条评论

Feedburner的计数

Does your Feedburner count seem to bounce up and down on a daily basis.你的Feedburner的罪名似乎反弹起来,每天下来。 Monday's it's fairly good, better on Tuesday, but then a big drop by the end of the week, and a precipitous fall at weekends?周一是相当不错的,在周二更好,但随后的一本周末大幅下滑,周末一急剧下降? Is it because old subscribers unsubscribe at regular intervals or is it just natural fluctuations due to the actual activity of the countless feed readers out there?是不是因为老订户退订,定期或只是自然的波动,由于饲料的无数读者的实际活动在那里?

I thought I'd do a quick analysis of some of my feeds to see if I could spot a pattern.我认为我会做好我的饲料,看看我能当场模式的一些快速分析。 As I said the feedcount fluctuates quite widely over the course of the week, but any day-to-day downward fluctuations across all my blog feeds are never more than 5% unless there's a big outage at Google Reader or another site and in general the trend is upwards.正如我所说的波动相当广泛feedcount在这一周中,但任何一天到一天我所有博客供稿向下波动不超过5%,除非有一个在谷歌读者或其他网站和一般的大停电趋势是向上。 If you think about it, there might be a large proportion of your subscribers who grab your feed from work or school but don't log into those accounts at weekends.如果你想一想,可能是您的用户大部分谁抓住你上班或上学饲料但不登录到周末这些帐户。 Conversely, there are some people who will only check feeds at weekend when they're not working.相反,有些人只是看谁饲料当他们没有工作的周末。

Of course, if you've only got 100 feed subscribers, a drop of five may seem like quite a few of your virtual buddies took umbrage and signed off.当然,如果你只得到100饲料订户,五个下降,可能看起来相当您的虚拟好友很少有人感到不快,并签署了。 Such a drop might trigger you to frantically rearrange stuff on your blog and maybe change direction for today's post.这种下降可能引发你疯狂地重新排列你的博客改变的东西,也许今天的哨所方向。 But, hold off doing anything too radical on that basis, next day you may be up to 107.但是,暂时不要做任何在此基础上过于激进,第二天,你可能会达到107。 So, did you get 12 new readers, or did the missing 5 simply show up in Feedburner's stats and you gained 7 genuinely new readers?所以,你得到12个新的读者,还是失踪的5只显示在FeedBurner的统计和你获得了7真正新的读者?

I think the latter is far more plausible, especially when I consider the feedcount for Sciencebase.我认为后者更为可信,特别是当我考虑了Sciencebase feedcount。 Sciencebase has almost 3000 subscribers (2908 at a peak last week) but I see the same percentage drops over the course of the week, which are then back to previous values by the following Tuesday. Sciencebase达到高峰时,上周)用户近3000(2908,但我认为在这一周中,同样比例的下降,然后回到以前的值由下周二。 I doubt very much I'm suddenly losing and gaining so many different people at a turn.我很怀疑我突然失去和获得一个又这么多不同的人。 It really has to be simple analytics fluctuations at Feedburner.这的确是简单的分析在Feedburner的波动。

So, the bottom line is: if you're looking at your feed count over the course of a month say, and seeing a slight climb, then you're doing well, even if there are peaks and troughs in between.因此,底线是:如果你看你的饲料数到一个月的过程中说,他看到一个小幅增加,那么你做得很好,即使有高峰和低谷之间。 In other words, it looks worse than it is when you see a drop.换句话说,它看起来不如它是当你看到一个下降。 And, of course when it's a climb from an average then that really is new people subscribing. ,当然当它从平均然后攀登的人真的是新的订阅。 So, as I've said before in a different context –因此,正如我以前说过的,在不同的环境- Don't Panic不要惊慌 .

1 response so far ↓ 1反应迄今↓

  • David Bradley 大卫布拉德利 // Apr 28, 2008 at 11:19 am 上午/ / 2008年4月28日在11:19

    netvibes updated itself last week and stopped reporting subscriber numbers to Feedburner. Netvibes的自行更新上周报告,并停止向Feedburner的用户数量。 Consequently, lots of sites with many subscribers from that system have seen a big drop in their totals, including Sciencebase.com which is down from well over 3000 to closer to 2200 or thereabouts.因此,很多网站从该系统的许多用户都发现他们的总量大,包括Sciencebase.com下降,这是远远超过了从3000至接近2200年前后。 Hopefully, they will rectify things soon.希望,他们会很快纠正的事情。

    db分贝

Leave a Comment发表评论