Sciencetext Tips & Tricks

Blogging tips, browsing tricks and computing hacks

Digital Piracy Management

November 17th, 2008 · by David Bradley

digital-rights-managementA new approach to preventing digital piracy of music and video content that sidesteps the need for the privacy compromise associated with DRM (digital rights management) is reported in the International Journal of Intellectual Property Management.

Thierry Rayna of the Internet Centre at Imperial College London and Ludmila Striukova Department of Management Science and Innovation, University College London, point out that privacy issues have come to the fore as e-commerce has matured. One area of particular concern to those involved in civil rights and data protection is the use of so-called Digital Rights Management (DRM). DRM provides a way of protecting the copyright holders’ intellectual property in music files and video but is a serious issue for the music and movie industries as unless a widespread adoption is achieved, a significant proportion of illegal file sharing of digital media is still likely to occur.

In order to fight piracy, some form of DRM technology is needed, but consumers are not as willing to adopt the current DRM systems because of privacy concerns and a lack of flexibility when sharing of files among their personal media players and computers.

The main advantage of DRM, they explain, is to prevent piracy, thereby maintaining a high demand for legitimate products and enabling firms to recover initial sunk costs. DRM also has crucial additional benefits in that it allows the copyright holder to retrieve information about the individual using the file as part of the activation of the music or video file they wish to use. “This revealed information can indeed be very valuable for firms, since it enables them to use price discrimination and increase their profits,” the researchers explain, “This is precisely this collection of information that is criticized by the proponents of piracy.”

The researchers have now outlined two approaches to solving the dilemma of how to fight piracy and yet not compromise consumer privacy. Their first solution consists of offering the consumer a reward in exchange for personal information. “Such information enables firms to discover the true value of a product for a consumer and to charge more for what is really liked,” Rayna told me. The solution proposed by the researchers is such that consumers never pay more than the regular price of a song, movie, program, so they are protected from the negative effects of price discrimination. In addition, consumers are charged for each product at a price that corresponds to its value. They are, thus, given access to a large quantity of products they would not otherwise purchase (since their value is lower than the regular market price), but most likely pirate.

Rewarding consumers for disclosing personal information has proven effective on the internet, for instance the “free” storage space amounting to several gigabytes that are made available to users of the Google Web Mail system in exchange for permission for Google to index their emails. Millions of users worldwide are quite happy to forfeit some degree of privacy in return for this “free” email facility and large amount of storage space, as well as the being able to search their email archives quickly. However, until now, this model relied solely on advertising, which is often considered obnoxious.

This rewarded price discrimination will work best with digital products that are consumed repeatedly, such as music, software, games, and video, but will not work so effectively for movies or books. The team has thus devised a second solution that introduces a different type of DRM system that aims to make digital goods rival, thereby leading to anonymous DRM.

This second approach would involve simply tagging the digital product with a unique code that would retrieve no personal data, but would prevent the same download from being played on more than one device at a time. This would preclude piracy without compromising privacy and would allow consumers to regain rights they used to have, such as using media content they purchased as they like or lending albums and movies to friends.

The researchers suggest that whatever solution is used to address the privacy concerns of consumers and to attack the piracy concerns of producers, a serious change of strategies is needed if DRM is to be used to its full potential.

Thierry Rayna, Ludmila Striukova (2008). Privacy or piracy, why choose? Two solutions to the issues of digital rights management and the protection of personal information Int. J. Intellectual Property Management, 2 (3), 240-252

7 responses so far ↓

  • Wayne Smallman // Nov 17, 2008 at 1:47 pm

    To be perfectly honest, does any of this research matter any more? DRM is effectively a dead end technology that no one wants to use, plus it’s turned into something of a political anathema…

  • David Bradley // Nov 17, 2008 at 2:32 pm

    You’re probably right Wayne, but I don’t think Apple are ready to ditch it just yet are they? I know EMI has gone that route and it’s what everyone on the consumer side would prefer. Personally, what I’d like is to be able to pay an annual subscription for access to everything I want so that I don’t pay a tenner for some album I listen to once and don’t like.

  • Juan Nunez-Iglesias // Nov 17, 2008 at 8:47 pm

    Neither of these solve the principal source of the problem, which is that it’s possible (even easy) to get a product for free that is superior to what the labels are selling. Why would I pay for a video that I can only play on one device at a time when I can have a fully unrestricted version, probably with a better compression quality, for free? The labels/studios need to at least match what the torrents offer.

  • David Bradley // Nov 17, 2008 at 8:50 pm

    Juan, I think the threat of ISP disconnection, fines, imprisonment, the general illegality etc may put off a large number of people if there were a stronger campaign against the piracy, especially if there were the equivalent of much cheaper legal digital products. But, the root of most piracy isn’t online anyway, it’s in the blackmarket of mass produced pirated software, DVDs, and CDs, and that’s a far more insidious and often overlooked problem that goes far beyond the torrent sharing.

  • Juan Nunez-Iglesias // Nov 17, 2008 at 10:10 pm

    Legality notwithstanding, DRM-restricted content is a losing proposition, as has been repeatedly demonstrated by the failure of the Wal-Mart, Yahoo and Microsoft music stores, which rendered legally purchased tracks unplayable in new devices.

    A substantial fraction of consumers must be conscious of these issues, as was demonstrated by a bump in EMI’s sales following the introduction of iTunes Plus DRM-free tracks.

    What I generally advocate these days to be on solid moral (if not legal) ground is to purchase the restricted copy (if no unrestricted one is available), trash it, and torrent the “good” version.

    You make a good point about the rest of the piracy world though, that I was definitely not aware of. Power to the companies when it comes to tackling black markets.

  • Peter Rouse // Nov 20, 2008 at 3:22 am

    There is one thing that seems to be forgotten in all this DRM etc. What happens after 20 years when the rights cease to exist. There is not a country in the world that has intl property or patent rights that exceed 20 years.The 20 years start from date of registry. No registration no right. I would suggest sticking to older than 20 to avoid file share prosecution.Also how are ISP to differentiate between legit(older than 20yrs/unregistered) or pirate audio or video streams.

  • David Bradley // Nov 20, 2008 at 10:41 am

    Peter, that’s a very interesting point. Of course, there are huge wads of cash to be made with back catalogs, just ask Mick Jagger and David Bowie (who floated his on the London Stock Exchange a few years ago). However, the royalties for everything but the biggest stars are miniscule even after just a few months. It would be so much easier if the copyright holders simply charged for the early adopters to have the trendy stuff and then just made it open access for everything older than a certain age. After all, there may be a spike when a new Madonna album is released, but it’s still Led Zeppelin, Queen, and Pink Floyd that people are still sharing en masse, and half of the members of those bands are either dead or rich enough not to worry…Mick Jagger excepted, of course.

Leave a Comment

Comments are checked for spam before appearing, no need to post it twice.

Related Posts