Compressing Your DNA
March 22nd, 2007 by David Bradley >> 4 Comments
Apparently, 2006 saw the digital universe pass 160 billion gigabytes (that’s 160 exabytes, for more on the exa prefix and its congeners check out this sciencebase article). That’s an awfully large number of digital photos, mp3 files, documents, and other digital info, to say the least. EMC recently pronounced on the future of digital information and predicted that 2010 would see a staggering 988 billion gigabytes of digital created information. Why they said 988 and not just a 1000, which would be 1000 exabytes (or 1 zettabyte, it’s those prefixes again!), I don’t know.
You would imagine that this quantity of data would be nothing compared to, say, the information encoded in the human genome. However, DNA just does not compare. According to Google founder Larry Page, who knows all about data, information, and the problems we face in creating, storing, and searching all this information, reckons the human genome could be compressed to just 600 megabytes (that’s several orders of magnitude less than all the digital data on the net, for instance). In fact, compressed you could fit all the information encoded in every cell in your body on to a single CD-R disk. Now, that’s a significant thought.
That said, the scale of complexity of the human brain is a different matter. While it may not feel like there is much room left for storage up there, especially the proverbial morning after the night before, the human brain has an estimated 1013 to 1015 synapses or connections between brain cells. If each synapse can “store” hypothetically a byte of date, that’s an awful lot of storage space. Of course, the brain is not a giant chunk of wetware DRAM, it is far more complicated than that, although chip speed between individuals varies enormously as we know.

"Deceived Wisdom: Why What You Thought Was Right Is Wrong" from David Bradley. Available now on 


Leave a comment ↓
DNA Networks // Aug 27, 2007 at 5:22 pm
Interesting perspective on this.
“chip speed between individuals varies enormously as we know”
HAHA
David Bradley // Aug 29, 2007 at 8:52 am
I do try…
seb. // Aug 6, 2008 at 7:25 pm
La traduction est vraiment très approximative, je n’ai pas pu comprendre toutes les phrases !
David Bradley // Aug 6, 2008 at 8:30 pm
Apologies for the translation quality Seb, I think it’s always an issue with posts with scientific jargon, whereas the other posts that are more general and use common language seem to translate fine, unless you know different.