Captcha Takes No Prisoners的Captcha採取任何囚犯
May 5th, 2008 · by David Bradley 2008年5月5日由大衛布拉德利
No one likes spam.沒有人會喜歡垃圾郵件。 I bet even spammers don’t like spam.我敢打賭,即使垃圾郵件發送者不喜歡垃圾郵件。 If you run a blog with comments enabled it can be an almost full-time job keeping on top of it.如果您運行的博客評論啟用,它可以成為一個幾乎全部兼職工作,保持再加上它。 If you’re on Wordpress, then the simplest way to keep on top of it is to use the如果您的WordPress ,那麼最簡單的方法,保持再加上它是使用 Akismet plugin akismet插件 which quickly learns what is and what is not spam.很快學會了什麼是,什麼是不是垃圾郵件。 Couple that with the夫婦,隨著 Akismet Auntie Spam Greasemonkey script akismet阿姨的垃圾郵件Greasemonkey中的腳本 (from (從 internnetducttape ) and you’ve got a convenient way of abbreviating the Akismet listings should you wish to give them the once-over, checking for false positives. )和你建立了自己方便的方式abbreviating該akismet物品應,你是否願意讓他們一度超過,檢查假陽性。
Some bloggers also like to run a script or plugin that creates a captcha on their comment form.一些博客也想運行一個腳本或插件造成的Captcha對他們的評論形式。 A little doodle of letters and numbers that are supposed to be machine unreadable.有點塗鴉的字母和數字,是為了被機器無法讀取。 There are many different versions, including re-captcha which does a secondary academic job of classifying unidentified words from scanned documents when your commenters complet the captcha.有許多不同的版本,包括轉口的Captcha但這次要的學術工作,分類不明的話,從掃描文件時,您提意見complet的Captcha 。
Please don’t use captchas.請不要使用captchas 。
Captchas may help trap spam, although they don’t prevent human-bots from entering spam, because they can complete the captcha, but they are a pain in the behind. captchas可能有助於陷阱,垃圾郵件,雖然他們不妨礙人類的bot進入垃圾郵件,因為他們可以完成的Captcha ,但他們是疼痛,在後面。 There are two types of captcha that are particularly annoying.有兩種類型的Captcha是特別煩人的。 First, there are those captchas that open either in a popup window or separate tab after one has hit “submit”.第一,有一些captchas開放無論是在一個彈出窗口或單獨的標籤後,一,打擊了“提交” 。 This is just plain silly.這僅僅是平原愚蠢的。
Many people are driveby commenters, they want to read, assess, comment and get out as fast they can.很多人都driveby提意見,他們想要閱讀,評估,評論和失控,因為他們可以快速。 They do not want to see an additional page asking them to confirm their humanity.他們不希望看到一個額外的網頁,要求他們確認他們的人類。 Indeed, many has been the time when I’ve commented on a site, switched to another tab I was browsing and failed to notice the newly opened captcha tab until minutes later.事實上,許多人已的時候,我已經評論了一個網站,切換到另一個標籤,我是瀏覽和沒有通知,新開張的Captcha標籤,直到分鐘後。 I’m sure there have been occasions when I didn’t bother completing the captcha because of that so my comment was lost.我敢肯定,有場合時,我並沒有理會完成的Captcha因為如此,所以我的意見是丟失。 Use a captcha and you may lose comments.使用的Captcha和您可能會失去的意見。

There is another problem with captchas for those of us running還有一個問題,與captchas對我們這些運行 Firefox plugins such as NoScript Firefox的插件,如noscript . 。 No Script prevents sites running dodgy scripts in your browser, but it is not an intelligent sort of application it does not distinguish between dodgy and legitimate, it simply blocks scripts unless you allow them.沒有腳本,防止網站運行dodgy腳本在您的瀏覽器,但它並不是一種智能排序的應用,它並不區分dodgy和合法的,它只是座腳本,除非你讓他們。 So, when I wanted to comment on an item about they key combo所以,當我要評論對某一項目的約,他們的關鍵組合 Control-Alt-Delete控制按Alt -刪除 , I saw no captcha, clicked submit and then got a long-winded error message telling me I had not completed the unseen captcha and blocking my comment. ,我沒有看到的Captcha ,點擊提交,然後得到一長氣的錯誤訊息告訴我,我沒有完成看不見的Captcha和封鎖我的評論。
Now, my comment on Ctrl-Alt-Del (invented by another David Bradley) was not particularly important or impressive, but what if I’d been an entrepeneur or venture capitalist posting an exploratory comment on your blog.現在,我的評論就按Ctrl -按Alt -刪除(所發明的另一項大衛布拉德利)不是特別重要或留下深刻印象,但如果我想要一個企業家或風險資本家發布一項探索性的評論對您的博客。 A failed captcha could mean all the difference between a life-changing offer and eternal obscurity for your blog.一個失敗的Captcha可能意味著所有的區別,改變生活的提供和永恆的默默無聞,為您的博客。






















3 responses so far ↓三反應到目前為止↓
ChemSpiderMan chemspiderman // / / May 5, 2008 at 5:44 pm 2008年5月5日在下午5時44分
AS you know we have allowed annotation of records on ChemSpider.如你所知,我們已允許詮釋的紀錄chemspider 。 We DON’T ask for a login.我們不要求登錄。 Look at the result.看看結果。 Scroll to the bottom of this record:翻閱到底部的記錄: http://www.chemspider.com/Chemical-Structure.7475.html http://www.chemspider.com/chemical-structure.7475.html
See the “garbage”.看到“垃圾” 。 Spammers….垃圾郵件發送者… … 。
We are considering switching on a captcha.我們現正考慮在一個開關的Captcha 。 What would you recommend instead?你會怎樣建議呢?
ChemSpiderMans last blog post.. chemspidermans最後的博客帖子.. Care in Nomenclature Handling and Why Visual Inspection Will Remain照顧在名稱處理和為什麼目視檢查將繼續
David Bradley 大衛布拉德利 // / / May 6, 2008 at 8:44 am 2008年5月6日在上午8時44分
ChemSpiderMan, my suggestion not to use a captcha was not to suggest that any site let garbage through. chemspiderman ,我的建議不使用的Captcha並不表明任何網站,讓垃圾通過。 A site owner must have full control of content that appears on their site (unless they’ve deliberately set things up to be 100% community led, but even then you still need some form of editorial control).網站所有者必須具有完全控制的內容出現在其網站上(除非他們已經蓄意縱火的東西,直至100 %的社區主導,但即使是這樣,你仍然需要某種形式的社論控制) 。 Obviously, depending on the work load manual filtering of spam that slips through is the only way forward.顯然,這取決於工作負荷手冊過濾垃圾郵件說,通過單是唯一的前進道路。 Unless you can find a transparent captcha (there are some) that works 100%.除非你能找到一個透明的captcha (有一些)工程100 % 。
db分貝
ChemSpiderMan chemspiderman // / / May 6, 2008 at 12:13 pm 2008年5月6日在下午12時13分
I know you weren’t suggesting we let garbage through.我知道你不是暗示我們,讓垃圾通過。 I’m looking for an approach to block the spammers though.我要尋找一種方法來阻止垃圾郵件發送者雖然。 Can you suggest some “transparent captchas”?你能提出一些“透明captchas ” ? I can take a look at.我可以考慮一下。 Thanks David感謝大衛
ChemSpiderMans last blog post.. chemspidermans最後的博客帖子.. Jean-Claude Bradley Posts About New Trends in Science and Mentions ChemSpider讓克洛德安托布拉德利員額約的新趨勢,在科學和提到chemspider
Leave a Comment留下意見