接受評論發送同樣的消息到多個新聞組
2007年7月13日 · 由大衛布雷得里
從前，您注重了 避免評論發送同樣的消息到多個新聞組 在您的blog使用工具喜歡壞行為和Akismet。 這些加上機警的緩和允許您推遲在發送同樣的消息到多個新聞組規則海嘯擊中您的評論隊列的cr*p群phentermine、tramadol、貯藏啤酒乳房和更大的成員發送同樣的消息到多個新聞組。 然而，時間變動，現在一家newish公司評論提供專業地增加評論發送同樣的消息到多個新聞組到blogs橫跨地球的購買Blog，為費。 幾blogs例如 ProBlogger (誰描述它作為病殘)和 PureBlogging 下來艱苦想法。 公司聲稱多個被安置的發送同樣的消息到多個新聞組評論(它明顯地花費$19.99為100)將莫名其妙地促進SERPs (搜索引擎發生頁發送同樣的消息到多個新聞組評論連接的)站點。
我從未瞭解問題的評論發送同樣的消息到多個新聞組，至少只要SEO (搜索引擎優化)是。終究Google在大約在PR4之下的頁基本上忽略鏈接，因此關於一個典型的blog崗位的一個評論是不值得的根據排泄PR汁液從站點。 好有一種隱晦的可能性發送同樣的消息到多個新聞組的blog最終將獲取一些pagerank為各自的崗位，但有成千上萬blogs那裡它是很不太可能的一任意日常的blog為任何東西高度排列。
相反，倍數評論對跑高級評論員插入式意志允許一熱忱的commenter有他們的鏈接權利blog主頁(是PR5)的一個站點像有效數字。 現在，如果您是不道德的插入式是方式去像這樣的遊戲站點。 無論如何當然， Akismet和一位機警和目光敏銳調解人通過cr*p-flood將看見。
實際上，有反面對所有此。 如果那些人被支付發送同樣的消息到多個新聞組，如果那樣，則他們據推測使用他們的腦子和實際上讀項目則他們也許實際上增加原始的想法到崗位， 刺激進一步討論結果，和使許多blogs更加動態。 它可能結果是一件好事為blogosphere。 被支付的價格將是一個不值得的文本鏈接的包括對您作為調解人可能無論如何編輯的某一假站點!
Add me on StumbleUpon
Join me on Facebook
Browse my Flickr Photos
Follow my Tumblr Page
Check out my Pownce Profile
Follow my Twitters
Network with me on LinkedIn
Shout me on Digg
到目前為止8個反應↓
大衛Culpepper // 2007年7月13日在3:10 pm
我猜測我們將必須觀望「質量」這些有償的評論。 I just don’t see anyway they could be anything other than the general, non-specific, “Hey great post. I completely agree.” type of comment. In my opinion, that doesn’t doesn’t add to the discussion.
At just 10 cents a comment, it’s not going to be rocket scientists making these comments.
David Culpepper // Jul 13, 2007 at 3:15 pm
My bad… that should have been 20 cents a comment.
David Bradley // Jul 13, 2007 at 4:42 pm
20 cents…indeed
Funny you should mention those complimentary, as opposed to complementary, comments, I’ve got a post about that very subject on Monday. Watch this space…
Robert Irizarry // Jul 13, 2007 at 6:10 pm
The only thing I can think of is that comments do get indexed so there may be some benefit there. I’ve gotten google search traffic on my site as a result of reader comments so I suppose there may be some small effect.
Personally, I hope Google and other search engines will step in quickly and bury results for Buy Blog Comments. They’ve already taken action against Text Link Ads which is a far more legitimate organization so why not obvious spammers?
David Bradley // Jul 13, 2007 at 7:35 pm
Comments may be indexed but that doesn’t mean they pass on pagerank and if they have zero pagerank anyway then there’s nothing to pass on. SEO is not, as you know, about getting traffic from random sites, it’s about boosting rank in the SERPs
Wayne Smallman // Jul 13, 2007 at 7:53 pm
That last point is a good point; while the spammer is there, they might as well as write something original.
After all, they must have taken the the time to select the ‘blog as being appropriate in first place, right?
Additionally, I can’t see how this will run smooth with the search engines, since they’re on the look-out for duplicate content anyway.
So there’s a fair-to-good chance they’ve got their filters set to stun on comments, too.
But listen to us! Trying to apply common sense to a practice that exists only to extort and exploit…
David Bradley // Jul 13, 2007 at 8:06 pm
Like ye said t’other day.
“they’ll do owt bar werk”
Wayne Smallman // Jul 13, 2007 at 8:15 pm
I couldn’t possibly claim ownership of that particular pearl of wisdom.
That honour rest with my old dad…
Leave a Comment