接受评论发送同样的消息到多个新闻组
2007年7月13日 · 由大卫布雷得里
从前，您注重了 避免评论发送同样的消息到多个新闻组 在您的blog使用工具喜欢坏行为和Akismet。 这些加上机警的缓和允许您推迟在发送同样的消息到多个新闻组规则海啸击中您的评论队列的cr*p群phentermine、tramadol、贮藏啤酒乳房和更大的成员发送同样的消息到多个新闻组。 然而，时间变动，现在一家newish公司评论提供专业地增加评论发送同样的消息到多个新闻组到blogs横跨地球的购买Blog，为费。 几blogs例如 ProBlogger (谁描述它作为病残)和 PureBlogging 下来艰苦想法。 公司声称多个被安置的发送同样的消息到多个新闻组评论(它明显地花费$19.99为100)将莫名其妙地促进SERPs (搜索引擎发生页发送同样的消息到多个新闻组评论连接的)站点。
我从未了解问题的评论发送同样的消息到多个新闻组，至少只要SEO (搜索引擎优化)是。终究Google在大约在PR4之下的页基本上忽略链接，因此关于一个典型的blog岗位的一个评论是不值得的根据排泄PR汁液从站点。 好有一种隐晦的可能性发送同样的消息到多个新闻组的blog最终将获取一些pagerank为各自的岗位，但有成千上万blogs那里它是很不太可能的一任意日常的blog为任何东西高度排列。
相反，倍数评论对跑高级评论员插入式意志允许一热忱的commenter有他们的链接权利blog主页(是PR5)的一个站点象有效数字。 现在，如果您是不道德的插入式是方式去象这样的游戏站点。 无论如何当然， Akismet和一位机警和目光敏锐调解人通过cr*p-flood将看见。
实际上，有反面对所有此。 如果那些人被支付发送同样的消息到多个新闻组，如果那样，则他们据推测使用他们的脑子和实际上读项目则他们也许实际上增加原始的想法到岗位， 刺激进一步讨论结果，和使许多blogs更加动态。 它可能结果是一件好事为blogosphere。 被支付的价格将是一个不值得的文本链接的包括对您作为调解人可能无论如何编辑的某一假站点!
Add me on StumbleUpon
Join me on Facebook
Browse my Flickr Photos
Follow my Tumblr Page
Check out my Pownce Profile
Follow my Twitters
Network with me on LinkedIn
Shout me on Digg
到目前为止8个反应↓
大卫Culpepper // 2007年7月13日在3:10 pm
我猜测我们将必须观望“质量”这些有偿的评论。 I just don’t see anyway they could be anything other than the general, non-specific, “Hey great post. I completely agree.” type of comment. In my opinion, that doesn’t doesn’t add to the discussion.
At just 10 cents a comment, it’s not going to be rocket scientists making these comments.
David Culpepper // Jul 13, 2007 at 3:15 pm
My bad… that should have been 20 cents a comment.
David Bradley // Jul 13, 2007 at 4:42 pm
20 cents…indeed
Funny you should mention those complimentary, as opposed to complementary, comments, I’ve got a post about that very subject on Monday. Watch this space…
Robert Irizarry // Jul 13, 2007 at 6:10 pm
The only thing I can think of is that comments do get indexed so there may be some benefit there. I’ve gotten google search traffic on my site as a result of reader comments so I suppose there may be some small effect.
Personally, I hope Google and other search engines will step in quickly and bury results for Buy Blog Comments. They’ve already taken action against Text Link Ads which is a far more legitimate organization so why not obvious spammers?
David Bradley // Jul 13, 2007 at 7:35 pm
Comments may be indexed but that doesn’t mean they pass on pagerank and if they have zero pagerank anyway then there’s nothing to pass on. SEO is not, as you know, about getting traffic from random sites, it’s about boosting rank in the SERPs
Wayne Smallman // Jul 13, 2007 at 7:53 pm
That last point is a good point; while the spammer is there, they might as well as write something original.
After all, they must have taken the the time to select the ‘blog as being appropriate in first place, right?
Additionally, I can’t see how this will run smooth with the search engines, since they’re on the look-out for duplicate content anyway.
So there’s a fair-to-good chance they’ve got their filters set to stun on comments, too.
But listen to us! Trying to apply common sense to a practice that exists only to extort and exploit…
David Bradley // Jul 13, 2007 at 8:06 pm
Like ye said t’other day.
“they’ll do owt bar werk”
Wayne Smallman // Jul 13, 2007 at 8:15 pm
I couldn’t possibly claim ownership of that particular pearl of wisdom.
That honour rest with my old dad…
Leave a Comment