Sciencetext技巧&把戲
Blogging打翻,瀏覽把戲和計算文丐

得到關於您的Blog的更多評論

2007年6月21日 · 由大衛布雷得里

普通讀者將知道所有關於Sciencetext的頂面評論員槽孔。 評論幾個崗位,并且您分配的鏈接您的名字在評論將被促進對主頁,右上,假設您更比您的讀者評論了。

這種促進在所有blog可能促進整體評論數字,并且更多評論,當bloggers知道,手段更多互作用與讀者和那可能只是一件好事。 對話摔打獨白所有天。

但,有得到關於您在更多主流技巧大概不会看提及并且欺騙站點的您的blog的更多評論的兇手技巧,只有這裡在Sciencetext意志我們顯露這樣鬼祟扭動。

如此,它是什麼?

很好,那個兇手技巧是種植一個故意錯誤在您的崗位。 微妙的事,大概瑣細,一定不有爭議。 您不會相信多少夫子將來跑改正您的滑動,它逐字地是難以相信的。

您能彙集各種各樣的有力的論據,提出一個合法的假說用最清楚的期限,但,如果您做較小語法滑動或做是出於良好狀態您將kickstart評論洪水的單位換算。 說到這點,當然,問題以這樣技巧是它可能使您看起來愚笨,即使您宣稱差錯以後是故意的在評論螺紋,它可能讓也許認為的你的一些讀者厭惡您是簡單地沉默寡言的犯這樣一個明顯的錯誤。 當然,您在每個隨後崗位可能出版題為的崗位「得到關於您的Blog的更多評論」作為一种熏鯡魚包括所有差錯,但我是否仍然認為多數blog讀者,是相當聰明的生物,通過您將看見? Wot您是否認為?

到目前為止12個反應↓

  • Hsien列伊 // 2007年6月21日在4:09 pm

    「多數blog讀者,是相當聰明的生物」

    您假設得很多!!

  • 搶奪 // 2007年6月21日在5:59 pm

    Ha! 呀,一肯定事在這個互聯網世界,夫子愛錯誤。

    可能雖則得到有點兒令人疲勞,加上您也許也得到通認作為繼續得到它錯誤的blogger :D

  • 約翰Webber // 2007年7月31日在2:37 pm

    「Wot您認為?」

    正確拼寫是「什麼」。

  • 大衛布雷得里 // 2007年7月31日在5:56 pm

    是,約翰,我知道。 我試圖retro kitchy老skool幽默

  • 約翰Webber // Jul 31, 2007 at 6:47 pm

    Sorry David I was trying to make a joke :)

  • David Bradley // Aug 1, 2007 at 8:00 am

    No problem John…maybe it’s ill-advised of me to make silly jokes like that as probably some readers will see it as lame or a faux attempt to appear more youthful while others may just I assume I cannot spel

  • Svetoslav // Aug 11, 2007 at 6:54 pm

    Hi,
    everyone can make a grammatical error, but if you are showing a problem and its solution later on, and you have several mistakes people will feel lied and the respect towards you will decrease.

    by the way, please, fix the CSS problem because the page does not look very well and I write in 50px textarea which is not very good as well.

    Svetoslav

  • David Bradley // Aug 20, 2007 at 1:20 pm

    Svetoslav, the idea was actually a joke. I wouldn’t advise anyone to deliberately include mistakes in a post just to get comments. What would be the point? To what CSS are you referring, by the way, the Sciencetext looks fine in all the browsers in which I tested it. The comments box is certainly not just 50px across, if that’s what you mean. What browser do you use?

    db

  • Svetoslav // Aug 20, 2007 at 1:29 pm

    I tried Firefox 2.0.0.6 did you try posting a comment as user ?

  • David Bradley // Aug 20, 2007 at 3:15 pm

    Yep, just logged out and tested on 2.0.0.6 and it looks fine, do you want to email me a screengrab of the problem you’re facing? What resolution is your screen? What font size are you set to in the browser?

  • Svetoslav // Aug 20, 2007 at 4:13 pm

    By the way this was the last time I made a post. At this moment it seems OK.
    Cache stuff may be…

  • David Bradley // Aug 20, 2007 at 6:49 pm

    Svetoslav, it could’ve been a caching issue, the comment form worked perfectly for me on a test machine with that version of Firefox and indeed all the other browsers I tried. Perhaps you hit a blip and it didn’t fully call the CSS for whatever reason before you started typing…we’ll probably never know.

Leave a Comment

Comments are checked for spam before appearing, no need to post it twice.

Related Posts